The origin of Hegelian dialectic

The Hegelian dialectic, this is the union od the opposite conceptual positions, synthetized in thesis antithesis and synthesis, is a concept that we find in the Doctrine of science, in 1794, a book of Johann Gottlieb Fichte(1762-1814), where he has explained three concepts that are fundamental for the his dialectic and after that of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel(1770-1831), Fichte in this book, the First theorem explain the dynamic of Hegelian dialectic, he says: “We have enunciated three logic and fundamental principles: that of identity, that is the fundament of every other, and following that of opposition, and that of reason, that are melted in the first. The last that yield possible the synthesis process, that enunciate and are ground of its form. We hence not need other for to be sure of the formal validity…”; but important for the ideation of the Hegelian dialectic is important the second step. In same way, in the first synthetic act, in the fundamental synthesis (that of I and not I, is set a content for every possible future synthesis, and, also to this have we not need other. Everything, that must belong to the domain of the science, must develops itself from that fundamental synthesis.”; it is the origin of the Hegelian dialectic, but we must consider that Hegel has never used these words, this is thesis, antithesis and synthesis, that instead used Fichte, but the dialectic is, in opinion of Hegel, the conflagration of two principles and it determines the third principle, this is the synthesis, that has the nature of I and not I, in opinion of Fichte. Every concept is born from the conciliation of opposite, we must should search, to the first, these opposite notes of the enunciated concept(here of I and not I, because they are mutual determined themselves)”; it is the supreme definition of the hegelian dialectic, because the contrast between two principles, in the absolute spirit, coexist, and the melted of these principles yields the synthesis, this is the final being that has the ambivalent nature, this is the nature of I and not I, although Hegel not called them so. Following Fichte is more explicit  for this concept: “Nothing antithetic act , although it is presupposition for the possibility of the general analysis, is possible without its determined synthetic act, and nothing antithetic act determined is possible without its synthetic act.”; after the read of this step the fuck you are innumerable, because it is worse than a kick to balls, because the question, that isn’t properly philosophical: “What cock is the mean, fuck you?”; it is very simple, this concept want say that every condition not can realize itself without another condition, for example: why the screw has this strange form? This is with a cross or a line vertical or horizontal? Simple because we have screwdriver that has a tip with line or cross, and when we use the screwdriver one is joined to other, but before the use they are distinct and separated, after they are joined, and this union allows the unscrew the screw, one needs other, and the synthesis, this is the final result is the unscrew the screw; two antithetic concept that melted them, produce the final product, this is the final synthesis.

Alessandro Lusana