Difficulty of nothing
This concept has got much times and as much thought\; I follow think of Plato
swears that nothing is no be, and it is very true, also Gorgias said that no be
is an entity; in fact also no be is an name and rational concept, for example:
we must consider that nothing is against all or everything, but all exists, with
common exception, because there is also nothing, good is present against evil,
believer is against atheist, and other; then every concept has one contrary,
and to be is philosophical entity also no be, but also no be is entity because
it has one nature, a character, then is present, therefore is to be then it is an
entity. Johannes Scotus Eriugena(815-877a.Ch.) thinks that nothing is God
because he superior every essence then he we can’t consider as essence.
Plotinus(205-270a.Ch.) thinks that nothing is the matter, because hasn’t soul,
think and life, to Hegel(1770-1831) in every matter and other is present both to
and nothing, this is positive and negative also to matter. These think about
nothing perorates that nothing is existent, then it is not nothing, but it is
entity, both real and philosophical; but where is and where do we can nothing;
this is, can we find nothing to everything or no? Can we find nothing to
everywhere or no? Other question, how do we consider nothing? I think that
nothing is present but with very strong limits; because our think to nothing is
or universal, God is nothing, in the opinion of Scotus or is with matter, in
the opinion of Hegel; I think that nothing is very difficult to demonstrate
because it is very limited, this is to everything is present matter, soul and
life, also if it seems very absent, to tree we can’t see life, but it is
present; then think nothing is difficult, because absence of matter isn’t
nothing; for example, air isn’t matter but it is present, therefore it is
present then is essence. In fact we can consider that Plato thinks that isn’t
absolutely nothing, but absence of something that is nothing, shadow as absence
of light, but he didn’t solve problem, because we can find all but no certainly
nothing; then we can consider nothing as philosophical concept, but di
difficult to demonstrate.
Alessandro Lusana
