Other thinks of law

This essay surely doesn’t and won’t to consider some rule or article of law, but it want consider some step of law with philosophical think; in fact I have took some step of Outlines of philosophy of right, that is one book of Hegel that considers the law, or at last some particular step, with philosophical concept, then the contract is, according to opinion of Hegel, the contract is: “If to them there is need, benevolence and utility, that is hastens them to contract is that they are present, their presence is principal motive, then they must recognize them self on contract. As concept of property, that according opinion of Hegel is a moment when owner is present both human gender and according to opinion of law. These concepts are certainly elementary and obvious but if we consider it philosophical thinks also, these realities of law take other mean”, and around the contract again he says: “I can leave one property as an external thing and I must leave it as a conceptual property…”, and “But at this moment my will is other because it is devoid (of property); then this concept is unity of two will, and twice for the differences must waive of he self; but this identity of twice will is obvious that every will is he self also”, and: “This rapport is mediation of two identical will although different for owner themselves, it means that every one for his will ceases his property, and one become it”. Solution of this concept that is legislative always, certainly, but is also other think for philosophy because: “the mediation of will to cease a property and will to accept it, then of another is final result of two will, because one is present because other is.” I repeat this is obvious but to law is very difficult give this mean to a legislative, this is philosophical mean.

Alessandro Lusana