Muta verba

When we read something, it is the note for the shopping food, the masterpiece of literature, a relation to a conference, or a publicity on the poster, we can’t think that we are the voice of these texts, because they haven’t voice; the read of a document, that it is Middle Age or other epoch same process occurs, this is we are the voice and the life of books and documents; and if we think very well in fact it is a verbal interrelation, we are speaking to author, when we open a book the our dialogue to author is visible and audible; because while we are reading and we are hearing the voice of author, but the voice and the ear of author we are; bearer of voice and of hearing of author; the interpreter of a book or document or everything that is readable is a bearer of information, for example: during an examination we are the bearer of voice of author, because we repeat what the author has written; but rightly somebody is asking what is the function of adjective “muta”, this is mute of title? Simple because we are facing the examination, hence the author if he is again life, but it is depends from result of examination, because a killer can be very easy engaged, isn’t during the examination, therefore we are interpret of think, and more the author is died more is interpretation, because we are sure that nobody can ask to author his interpretation, because evidently to somebody the examination has had negative result, hence the killer has engaged already. The voice also in external rapports we are, when we are mentioning something through our memory, we are the bearer of the voice, and the author lives in that moment, a sort of reincarnation, the actor is same; because during the interpretation he is bearing the Hamlet, hence Shakespeare(1564-1616) has engaged a bearer that bears the voice of Shakespeare? No certainly but the voice of Hamlet; hence the actor is ambassador of two States England and Denmark, and he tells the will of twice the States through one voice but two nations, and his interpretation is heard from two people, the first is of the Denmark and the second of England, because the language is English, but Hamlet was Danish; the actor is an ambassador that must take order and will from his governs that are one the director and the second, more important than the first is product: one is England govern and the second is Denmark govern whose he is ambassador; and the is the third State is the public, that has thousands of ambassadors; for the writers is same thing; but now the product is editor and the second State is the argument about the writer is writing, because the argument want that his history and presence is tell rightly, and the public is the greatest country that has thousands of ambassadors, and everyone has his opinion, as the single ambassador has his opinion, but he must report alone the opinion of his govern and stop. Inasmuch the writer and the actors are tied to same destiny, this is the perennial mutism, because they must bring alone the other voice.

Alessandro Lusana