Denaturalize

In some contest the denature is automatic, our behavior and language are denatured because the formal presentation is normal and protocol, this is in conformity to rules that are necessary to avoid accidents; for the language it is normal and the pronounce must be correspondent to common expression, but not absolutely in common acceptation, but through a formal presentation that must be correspond to the rule and roll that we have in that occasion; we are denatured, this is we renounce to our nature for a posture that is normal. In the theatre every word is denatured because the actor would says other begin from the oath, but certainly that he is saying is distant and long from the natural daily; hence it is the denature language, and also the unnatural behavior; he is in the protocol, that the public want, the public want the unnatural behavior, the unnatural language, unnatural reaction. The formal behavior is necessary to accord during the negotiation, but everybody must denaturalizes herself, because more important sake is present. During the interpretation an actor must denaturalizes herself, because he must fells the emotionalism of personage, and episode for a great actors, by now past, but exceptional, I mean Kirk Douglas(1916-2020), that after the movie on Vincent van Gogh (1853–1890) he has said, while he gazed the paintings of van Gogh in a museum of Holland: “How much painting I have painted”; in that moment Douglas has had denaturalized herself, and he has enters in van Gogh, because he was in that moment van Gogh; inasmuch Kirk Douglas was become the bearer of voice of van Gogh, this is of the denaturalized Kirk Douglas, in that moment was Vincent that spoke, and hence Kirk was alone the ambassador of his govern, inasmuch van Gogh. The writer is same thing he is alone the ambassador of a personage, that can be true or imagined but the author is denaturalized, why? Simple because he must be bearer of a voice that isn’t his, but alone of personage, that there isn’t, but that given to author his ideas, the sheep of narration because the protagonist of this tale, romance or essay is going to give the rationality and sense to whole history; inasmuch the author is spokesperson of the personage, or of his fantasy, if he is writing a romance, otherwise he is going to be spokesperson of other writer, philosopher or scientist; when the author is died, the free interpretation become very free, because nobody, can deny; more free than other when the personage is fantastic, because the rapport between States is dual, why? Simple because the ambassador of personage calls the rationality, and she given to its ambassador precise instructions, it is possible and is isn’t! And the personage after the contact to rationality gives the instructions to author, that is always the last, because he is alone the spokesperson, hence he must represent alone two governs, or even three, because after is also his style that want its presence, and it want, peer to other, a right consideration.

Alessandro Lusana