The reaction of Niezsche

I don’t think that nobody has though that the superman of Nietzsche(1844-1900) is theory of a man that has hated his society and behavior. We must consider that the idea of superman is a theoretical and utopian think that has his enemy to society very formal and hypocritical that in Europe has had consolidated; aesthetic life that was empty and useless, alone the form and behavior was important; I think that Nietzsche has reacted to this false word. I we think about superman, a philosophical and theoretical man of Nietzsche, that hasn’t human characteristics because he is over daily concepts of morality and other bonds to society, figure, elegance, behavior and other; thereupon other myths, that we attend every day to several motives; then he overwhelming the normal morality and normal respectability, that is fundamental to live in society; and Nietzsche in the Over the good and evil overwhelming these concepts, in fact is Born of tragedy he considers, and it is very important to wiling that I have found here, the spontaneous live , the spontaneous behavior, that prescinds to society; and the religion is enclosed in this matters  because he has considered that religion is motive to hold the wit of human gender; he has consider his society and respectability of his time and hypocrisy of his society; when enemy of Nietzsche is his time, his behavior, his custom, because he has insisted to spontaneity, why? Because he has been witness about his time; he is the prophet of immoral spontaneity, I use this adjective and I want mean that Nietzsche is supporter of human behavior; certainly he has been involved by morality and respectability of Belle epoque, and he certainly would have refused what he has said, because in conformity of opinion of Oscar Wilde we can say that: "Spontaneity is a very difficult behaviour to hold".

Alessandro Lusana