Socratic Aristoteles

Through read of Repubblic of Platon we can undestood the spring of razionality of Ariastoteles, that is evidently and mecanic in sillogism; some step of Repubblic can gives explication of this concept; “…To whom and what justice must returns to have thi name? We must be coherent to said after, we must give favours to friends and harms to enemies. You say that to Simonides we must give good to friends and harms to enemies?”, this elementar step is normal but it is alsoa teaching about the razionality of Aristoteles; because this logic think is important to understand the philosophy of Aristoteles, sillogism, that is peack of this rationality, because he used the logic and the formal logic, and it is coherent in logical development, abstract it is concept, because in real life it is different certainly, but in logical think is perfect, this method of philosophical teaching is from Platon; other step: “…when we play who is valid aid the right man or expert player?”, answer: “Expert player” and other: “We can set stones to build brick is opportune to have the right man or  mason?”; these answer we would give to somebody that has asked same things; certainly but is is the origin of razionality of Aristoteles, at last to method; and other step, I think, ground of this way, they are saying about the right man and Socrates says about a sentinel that has took secrets of enemies: “The sentinel is very good because he has took secrets?” the answer: “Certainly”; and “Thereupon if one man is very good sentinel he is also very good thief”, therefore the right man is clever to keep money and he is likewise to thief”, answer:” Certainly”, therefore, ends Socrates: “We are standing to evidence the right man is also a thief…”, these steps are very explain of rationality that has origin in Socrates and follows to Platon and come to Aristoteles, thereupon we can think that Aristoteles is socratic thinker, althoug he hasn’t known Socrates; and this sillogism is mechanical think that we can tookm from Socrates but through Platon and after to Aristoteles. Other step: “…So is friend who seems good and he is so. Who seems good but he isn’t so, he is also mislaiding friend and certainly no true, and same criterion is valid to enemy”; other: “From this think we can undestand that friend is right man and enemy evil…”. It is razionality thought but is is also Socratic.

Alessandro Lusana