Praise of nothing

This essay about a north European writer, this is Knut Hamsung(1859-1952), that I think unknown to readers, and I invite them to read his tales, because he got all style of English literature, this is the modest action and the nothing history; during read of his tales is very difficult to find a history, but in return they see very much nature; some precisely about wood and field are very argument for distraction, because this read is very boring and some to every sales. Every work descripted is common and devoid of continuity, this seems a description of daily action and this tales are a diary alone, an example that I have got from The son of sun, a tales: “To night its snowed. He has thought how much birds are going to be cold in the wood, where the violets are very wrong on the field, before that they are dying” this is an examples alone but is very important because all tales is so; nothing is never motive for interest. I know that somebody could comment why to read this tales, I answer, because this literature document is a perfect example about you do not write a romance or tales. A romance has an action and storyline, some connection with habit but, above all, with storyline because the reader can understand what is motive of romance or tale; landscape and other very less important are literature gimmicks for a momentary distraction, or for continuity of action; but now for Hamsun are present and without action, without protagonist, dialogues and nonsense, but returning very much boredom. Therefore these tales are necessary for to understand way about don’t write a romance.

Alessandro Lusana