Socrates: an ancient psychologist

Socrates figure of philosopher is very famous (died in 399b.Ch.), but I want in this assay consider a character of his research of truth of everyone; he, following the witnesses, asked in plate of Athens, or in ancient Greek άγορά, through constant askes and logic, he determined contradictions and failed, therefore the theory of presumable philosopher failed all. But I think that his inquiry was certainly to research a rational method of inquiry, without contradictions, and after, I think that he was researching enter to soul of pupils, although he has considered herself a pupils and no certainly a master; but meaningful of some question, as γνώθι σαυτϖν this is, know yourself, it is the first inquiry about a human nature that we have, because Socrates wanted suggest to man: “What is your truth and why it is so?”, but Socrates known perfectly that every think is from brain and this is bounded to with; the Egyptian medicine had made much discoveries; and he known that every think is direct from intellect; therefore every think is from a size of wit; Socrates discovered man, but mankind, and his habit and way to think. He with contradictions of others he wanted taught the logic of think, rationality, coherence and rigor; he wanted teach first your with and after with rationality research of philosophical theory, but through the rationality limit that wit, his with in fact was very calm when he could escape from Athens, but  he want give last teaching, he with extreme clam affronted his end drinking the hemlock; I want consider that it was last teaching of Socrates, in front of death he die, although Crito give him possibility of escape; he refused and he took the death; I think that it is definitive teaching of Socrates; although in tragic context we must keep no alone calm but rationality, and consider that the death is natural to mankind. This think is conformed from other philosophical book but of Aristoteles, Nicomachean ethic, when the same philosopher said about the wit and human choice that are determined from wit; thereupon interest to psychological nature was evident; Socrates is first that discovered all mankind, included hide and emotive conditions; and he bore it to philosophical knowledge; may alone intuitive certainly, but it is a beginning, he could called the first psychologic of history.

Alessandro Lusana       

  

    

 

Peccatores quoque salvos fecit: Caravaggio

I think that is difficult to know Michelangelo Merisi called Caravaggio, because he was born in Milan but his family transferred to Caravaggio, a little town in province of Bergamo, Italy. Here I want consider an idea that is evident because Caravaggio painted, but is very hide because in conformity of opinion of Musil(1880-1942) an Austrian writer, that ruled that “the monument is so great and nobody sees it”, in fact in Italy is normal that very much tourist ask where is a monument and they are walking on. I have thought that the light of Caravaggio on Conversion of saint Mattew(Fig.1), has peculiarity that has opening radius so large and it involves also who is busied to count the money, and not looks Christ, on contrary Mattew looks and indicates herself, but the counter no, because he is in sin and he ignores Christ; thereupon Christ salved both converted and the sinner; we can consider the episode of Gospel when Christ give the vision to blind, and to same blind Christ said: “ I have come on the word to work a judge, so that who doesn’t see can see and who see become blind”; therefore in conformity of iconology(discipline that studies the meaning of artist works) we can argue that who counts money is blind to faith, but Christ is going to salve also him, and this interpretation is given by saint Paul, in the first letter to Timothy: “It is a word of faith and very worthy of acceptance, this, that Christ Jesus come on the word to salve the sinner, whose I am the first, and I reached mercy because to me he showed Christ his goodness to whom to believes to him for eternal life…”. A difference very modest is to first version of saint Mattew(Fig.2), now in deposit of Hermitage museum in Russia, that from 1945 they thought lost, on contrary it was stolen from a soldier of Red armed; in this version Caravaggio used same radius for space and he included twice figures, but angel is normal because he is a sent by God and saint Mattew seems very astonish because he is writing the his Gospel, but in conformity to tradition of Gospel, Mattew was a publican, as the sinner that ignores Christ on painting(Fig.1), and thereupon also Mattew is a sinner, that, trough the light of mercy, is going to be salved; same vision that we have to Conversion(Fig.1)why? Because publican that doesn’t look Christ is involved from the light, as angel and saint Mattew in the saint Mattew and angel(Fig.2); but I must add that when I attended the High school, this painting was considered lost, and second comments about it has said that saint Mattew was astonish because he was writing, because illiterate; alone bullshit! Saint Mattew was a publican and he have to know count and litter to write names and money that he have to take; thereupon he written the first Gospel after the conversion, with or without angel, anyway the radius of light involved twice figures, because the saint is by now Christian, but publican of Conversion isn’t so, and to that moment neither Mattew, because he indicates herself, but he doesn’t Christ, and radius of light involve both saint Mattew and the publican near, but light is same to twice, because also who hasn’t recognized Christ as savior of the world, after is going to make it, this light is therefore saving, both sinner and saint, for this it involved two figure, one by now salved, saint Mattew but also the sinner is going to salve by this light. A curiosity; this version of painting(Fig.1), is refused from cardinal Cointrel, because, in conformity with outclassing opinion of some decade ago, the saint was very poor and vulgar, but the major studious of Caravaggio, Maurizio Marini has declared that this painting was refused because the angel, is female angel, this is the nephew of same cardinal that then has had six years and Caravaggio studied this baby and portrayed hers on the painting, therefore an angel, usually male has become female; it is no admissible because during Counter-reformation application of dictates of religion were holy and everybody have to respect it, then a angel have to be a male angel and stop.

Alessandro Lusana  

Fig.1

Fig.2

  

 

Literary morality

Through read of a romance as Pamela of Samuel Richardson(1689-1761), this romance was published between in 1740 and 1741. We can understand what was a society, a document that on official document we can’t find, because it is immaterial document, this is morality of a century and society, but author of this romance lived in England, thereupon he took morality of England of 18^th century, that is deducible from this romance, a letter of this epistolary romance Pamela said:“I will die a thousand deaths, rather than be dishonest any way.” And other letter to hers mother she writes: “As my last was to my father, in answer to his letter, I will now write to you; though I have nothing to say but what will make me look more like a vain hussy, than any thing else:…”, what is so wicked and dishonorable she hasn’t said, but may has spoke to a man on the street, and it isn’t quip because in that time morality and conformism was very strong, and a woman that spoke to a man she was a slut; anyway documents other use that orders that all is depends from man: “ Pamela shall come and live with me, I think. With all his heart, he replied; he should be glad to have me so well provided for. Well,’ said she, I’ll consult my lord about it.” An episode in other letter shows that also a kiss to a maiden was a crime: “(a waiter think he called me his pretty Pamela; and took hold of me, as if he would have kissed me(for which, you may be sure, I was very angry)”; certainly a woman can fells nuisance to this act but angry is too much, and in cat she has underline that this maiden has appreciated her prudence and modesty, she writes: “and told me she was very well pleased to see my prudence and modesty”, but limit is very crossed inn following compel: “I cannot bear to be looked upon by these men-servants as they are apt to look upon me…”, evident noise she has felt because they are servants. We can consider the example of mother of Charles 5^th of Spain(1500-1558), his mother was nicknamed “the crazy”, because she has loved his husband, and a time attacked a waitress because has looked his husband; why it? Because in that time weddings were alone to interest of states and no certainly to love; thereupon Johannes, mother of Charlies 5th loved his husband? Yes!, she was crazy, and stop! We must think that it were other context and other costumes, because the needs were other; today marry to interest is ignoble but in that time it was normal work; every aristocratic family or of high level worked these marries to political motives, napoleon married Mary Louise of Austria because necessary in that moment to Napoleon; thereupon we can certainly reproached this behavior, but policy doesn’t consider the happiness or sentiments, but alone utility to the nation. We can this romance as example to study the morality and other, without prejudice, because we must think that other times have other instruments and strategy.

Alessandro Lusana  

 

Same motive to two classes

An anonymous writer of ancient Greek has written a brochure against democracy and his model, this is areopagus, this is ancient Greek parliament or congress; and motive of Athenian democracy is evident for a step: “For this we have given parity between slaves and freemen, and citizens and strangers resident in the city, because the city needs of strangers to works that they know make and to fleet, for this we have given the parity to strangers” and to consent of people: “Sacrifices, victims, parties, sacred enclosures. The people knows well that  it isn’t to everybody of poor make sacrifice and sacred banquets and get victims, inhabit in a city wonderful and rich; thereupon has reached way necessary to obtain it. The sacrifice to public spending more victims, and the people eats and share animals died. Beds, dressing room, some rich man own it. But the people build to herself, to his use, gyms, dressing room, beds and to this enjoys very much people on contrary of rich”. We can consider that it is philosophy of free market, because gain is very much, and differently from rich, that is alone, people is very much persons; this is simply obvious; but we can consider that the think about free market is born to think of Adam Smith, but he has took alone that is has seen, this is liberalism(in Europe this is name, and no confuse to American liberal, that are contrary, because the liberal in acceptation European are republican party), this is building of beds, pools and dressing room, so that everybody enjoys of these pleasure; this is democracy thank God, no! It is will of gain thank money, that is right, but this step suggests that democracy is a mask to hide true will and desire, this is the gain; we can concord or no, but it is the truth, because a bed, a dressing room, a pool, isn’t free, never, but free market exists to these need, that every man and woman has; and if isn’t monetary gain it is alone politic, because the candidate can given to electors now that people want and after election forgotten every promise; therefore the gain is democracy and democracy is gain because takes from very much persons. Other truth is evident:“(the people) understands that the cure and instruction of choir of theatre, to cure of gyms, and preparation of ships, are rich men that must command  and decide, and people is conducted,  for this is right takes money to sings, run, and dance and make the sailor, to gain”. We are to usual motive, gain, that it is from people of aristocratic is same matter, this is money. The justice is same dynamic, a step confesses that: “…the salary of judge insured on year to deposit of accusation and defense, necessary to regular the life of cities allies…”, therefore other gain to judge and Athens gain, and we can consider that judge is certainly high social class; thereupon is people or aristocracy gain is motive; it is motive of democracy, gain.

Alessandro Lusana  

 Pagan franciscan• .

 

I understand that contradiction is evident, because the Franciscan order is catholic and no certainly pagan, but we can find some Franciscan in ancient Greece, who is? Pithagoras, objections to this thesis are as many evident, in ancient Greece aren’t Franciscan order is born in 1209, but after Christ, thereupon it isn’t possible, but some steps of Life of Pythagoras of Iambic he said About the philosopher and he said: “To these motives(searching of knowledge) he ordered abstinence to wine, and moderation to food and sleep refuse of glory, of richness and similar, sincere respect to old men, true sentiment to equality and goodful to contemporary, and to young solicitude without envy, and friendship to everyone, friendship to gods to mankind, through religious pity and worship of knowledge…” and: “I exhort my monks in God that when they go to world, they don’t quarrel, and they must avoid disputes of word, neither judge other, and they must be mild, peaceful and modest and humble…”, this is a Catholic Franciscan that has written this advisements. The Franciscan order aforementioned said regard to possess and richness: “…living(the Franciscan monk) living under obedience , without something and chastity…” and: “the Franciscan monk promises obedience  to pope and successors, and others monks must obey to Franciscan monk and his successor.”, certainly fascinating but where is connection? Two are motives by connection, securely without influence, because I doubt it that Saint Franciscan known Pythagoras, neither name, but bound is in poverty rule; Iamblic said: “To these motives(searching of knowledge) he ordered abstinence to wine, and moderation to food and sleep refuse of glory, of richness and similar” and: ““ I order that they can’t receive money or richness…”,, to prove of new Franciscan in the role of order is written: “ Ministers of order send them to trustworthy, and give to them cloth of order this is cassocks without caps and belt…every monk wear poor cloth”, also the Pythagorean has had the uniform, white cloth…Ended the year of prove, they are welcome received to obey promising to observe this rule during his life”, we know that also the Pythagorean philosopher have to spend a period during they have to use the rule of this school, in fact Iambic tells regard new pupils that: "...he didn't accept soon new pupils that want ed attend his school, but after that he has examined them and judged; and regard to friendship, the Franciscan order said: “I exhort that monks to not despise the men that they see rich cloth and colored and to use delicate food and drink…”, the despise of richness we can read also in Franciscan rule, moreover regard the monastic life a bound is: "To Pythagorean he ordered the commonality of goods and continue life in common...", also here is bound because monastic life is same. ; thereupon the rule s are independent and autonomous, but coincidences are present  in twice texts, because we can called these rules or Franciscan or Pythagorean, or better we can fuse twice and called pagan Franciscan. Moreover regard the monastic life a bound is: "To Pythagorean he ordered the commonality of goods and continue life in common...", also here is bound because monastic life is same. The love of Saint Francis to animals, because he considered them our brothers, other bound is, in fact Pythagoras, in conformity of tell of Iamblic: “The animals alone we can sacrifice, not entry human soul, and who need food can sacrifice alone the animals to sacrifice, other no absolutely, and herself lived so and adoring alone altar that hasn’t sacrifice, and working to no sacrifice made by other similar to us, and educating the fear with world rather than punitions…General is kinship among living, that through community of life of same elements they are similar to us”, and: “No damage plants cultivated and fruitful , and animal that isn’t danger to humankind…They(the Pythagorean)disapproved the hunting…”, the love to animals of saint Francis I have after mentioned. Regard the expiation, certainly no Catholic but pagan, Iamblic tells: “In fact we are in the word to expiation and we must make it”, same concept of saint Francis, we must expiate with adherence to Gospel. Regard observance of laws: “They(pupils of Pythagoras) give the afternoon to public administration, to external policy, rapports to strangers, in conformity of obedience to laws, same obedience that Franciscan order given to Gospel, that is law to them. Regard the purity of soul: “He admonished moreover abstention from all that can obstacle profetic capacity and purity of soul and chastity…", we can confuse these rules with a Franciscan rules; thereupon of Pythagoras was Franciscan or saint Francis was Pythagorean, or noither one and second, but coincidence are very and very interesting.

 Alessandro Lusana

 

Egyptian Pytagoras

We can consider a biographical moment of life of Pytagoras, this is travel to Egypt, and a step of life of Pytagoras of Iamblic, where Thalete solicited him to come to Egypt: “…Thelete exorted him to travel to Egypt, and meet priest of Memphis and Diospoli…” and “…by these herself has took what is necessary to called wiser person…” I think that this step of Iamblic is very important to know origin of very famous theorem of Pytagoras, because we must consider that this learning of geometry is alone Egyptian , and thereupon we have two sources of this theorem, these are Thalete and Egyptian, but twice are Egyptian origin, because Thalete said that: “…by these herself has took what is necessary to called wiser person…”, thereupon also Thelete has had in Egyptian, and he has took all necessary from Egyptian science, as indeed Hippocrates was going to take medical science, and he to this travel gone to Sidon, and there with others wise he took other information about other matters, and other Egyptian step : “he known that religious rites of that town  were important and derived from Egyptian…”, and other step very important: “ There(Egypt) he moved he visited all temples with greater interest and attention and he took admiration sympathy to priest and prophets, and asking the teaching about every thing…”; this is step is very important because to build pyramid and temples were necessary deep knowledge about geometry and general mathematics, therefore he has certainly asked about these science and he has could take knowledge about geometry from direct sources; thereupon the theorem that we know of Pytagoras is certainly from Egypt, in fact other step of this biography says: "...in the intern of temple he studying astronomy and geometry; thereupon matter of theorenm of Pytagoras; and I consider impossible that during 22 years passed in Egypt nobody has informed him about these geometrical theory and other; we must consider that, in conformity of Egyptian costume, every knowledge was keep in secret, because it was destined alone very little, this is architects, and people not certainly know it, but Phitagoras was aristocratic man and access to these secrets was very easy; therefore both before and after, the Egypt, he has passed 22 years, has educated the ancient Greek, both medical science, Hippocrates and geometry, this is Pytagoras.

Alessandro Lusana

 

 

Biblical and pagan source

The Byzantine history has his sources that sometime are bliblical next, for example is Niceta Coniata(1155-1217), a historical man that has told about Byzantine and some his emperor, and one of war of Manuel, emperor, son of John, emperor, he said, during passage of river of Melan on center of Greece: “...so current of river partial was rejected from the hooves of horses and partial was hindered and it withheld long his natural course, it seems goes back against nature; this tell is laughable, but after laugh we can think that back these lies are two precise literary sources, the first is Herotodus, and his description of Nile river of Egypt, and second is Exodus of Holy Bible; in Byzantium the people told the Greek, ancient Greek, therefore they could read both Herotodus and Holy Bible, thereupon both crossing of Nile and the crossing of Red sea were familiar, and naturally; the fate of Egyptians soldiers in Exodus is same of these barbarian people, in fact they everybody is died. Other contradiction of this narration is that although both Manuel emperor and Niceta were almost contemporary, he doesn’t say that he seen the bones of soldier, but he days: “Until now witness the great quantity of died the piles of bones, but very much time was past and bones is impossible that was visible. Other reference that is very literary is Homeric Asteris, this is isle of Odysseus, and that this geographical position is literary alone, is certainly confirmed  by position, near Ithaca, that has given by Niceta, but today it is very uncertain because in conformity with text of Homer, Ithaca isn’t the isle that today is identified; thereupon this position is literary alone in text of Niceta. Other mention of Holy Bible is from Song of songs: “I am black and beautiful because the sun has seen me”, from Holy Bible. But the Greek is present again because 254 miles from Ithaca is Corfu other Greek island, and other Homeric reference, now it isn’t evident but searched, because Iliad of Homer tells about siege of Troy city, that was sieged for teen years and alone with deceit was took from Greek; and when Manuel after an embassy of Corfu, and he when entered to city he noted that this city was unconquerable, as Troy that was took with deceit alone; we must consider that Manuel could not wait teen years, then he waited and welcomed embassy because his aim was the Sicily in Italy.

Alessandro Lusana

    
    

 

 

Spirit of nations

The citation of Montesquieu on title is very valid and suitable and right to define an wit, no certainly race, because this last is integrated to spirit and it is very factor; but I want underscore the wit of a people, that is different everywhere; I provide the denials, because the reader is going to say, : “My spirit no change never!”, on contrary it change and radically; we can imagine that an embassy invite us to a dinner; the protocol orders that rules of behavior, because it determine national rapports, thereupon you must have exemplar behavior, and stop. Our spirit is changed; certainly very little are invited by embassy, but to grade lower, a dinner among the friends or a party, the protocol want a polite behavior; therefore they invited alone person that we known and no certainly common people and impolite persons; thereupon our spirit is changed, and town is different, an house and an embassy, therefore to every town is a spirit; a party among friends, old classmates is very different to a party in embassy, and elegant dinner, because jokes, comments and memories are present and some episode, very amusing is habitual; but when we go out from home our spirit is different, because we are going  to meet other persons, and it is motive to change the spirit, when we are in our house we change again, because the context is familiar, and we change, after job, is daily. This series of examples is necessary to explain that the race is similar and the nations are spiritual production, made to men and peoples but people is men, therefore spirits, and a nation is a spirit; the race is very marginal factor, because the education is relevant, and it is obvious, but we are educated both out and in house, in home we are educated by parents and out home from society, the conformism is an education, because unofficially orders what is momentary costume; we educate our spirit always. The nations consequentially are a productions of our spirit, and a people that is composed of men and spirits; the spirit of a nation is his people. Mussolini said: “The race is alone spiritual condition and no certainly a real matter”, and Lessing note that the differences among peoples is physics alone.

Alessandro Lusana

 

Ghost writer

Andrew was very busy to go out from a struggle very important a usually crisis of writer; he is searching some history, and he has took episodes of his days; after he searching again in the mind, tried the casuistry of genres, love, love in fall, tragedy, revenge, mystery history, detective and others, but nothing. He raised the eyes and he seen a man in the room with equal cloth and equal face, and all equal; he got up immediately and asked very cloud: “Who are you?”, and repeated: “Who are you? Answer, otherwise I will call the police”, the man was firm in center of room, and after a very short glance to floor, fixed the eyes to Andrew, that meantime was to telephone, and he called the police, and the man said: “It is useless because to arrest me you will keep me company”, Andrew looked the man and asked: “You are crazy, you are going to arrest, and no certainly me!”, and the man hinted a smile and answered: “But I am you and you are me, we are same person, but I am now out from you because you have need of I rest here out”, and Andrew thereupon asked: “Who are you?”, and the man answered: “I am Andrew, this is ghost writer of Andrew, that everybody has, but you are a writer and thereupon in your brain is developed, but every man has this ghost, and you have it because you are a man and a writer, that now has crisis, because you haven’t idea”, Andrew seen intensely the ghost and he admitted it: “Yes! I haven’t idea from ancient Greek “ideon” that means imagine”, and the ghost: “It is very important but I know it because I come from your brain, and I know ancient Greek as you because I am you”. Andrew was desperate because he doesn’t nothing idea, and he turned to ghost and asked: “Do you have some idea? No certainly, it seems hear to me! Because you are writer and I am you and other bullshits, and…”, the ghost thereupon answer, interrupting Andrew: “You can tell about this experience”, and Andrew seen intensely the ghost and asked: “What experience? I haven’t nothing expe…”, the ghost interrupting: “Yes, you have experience, this experience, you are speaking to me, do have never you made it?”, Andrew seen his library, table, window, and, he seated and seen the ghost and: “What can I write?” and the ghost: “you can write that…”. This story will continue when they have end…

Alessandro Lusana     

 

Completion and go back of a revolution

A book very well of Vsevolod Mihajlovič Eichenbaum, this is Volin(1882-1945), has been a anarchy writer and literary critical, more active in tentative on revolution in 1905, he founded the first soviet,  that had been that first announcement of a revolution very hide; this book has title of the unknown revolution, because he has took  a roots of Russian revolution, this is no certainly soldiers and armies, but something very strong and potent, what is? The brains, because conditions of backwardness of Russian during 19^th century was very impressive, servitude was a law, the power was alone in rich owner of lands and in the zar, the people was excluded from participation and other policy dynamics, but noted the will of people the zar has allowed reforms, certainly today laughable, but then considered very important , we must consider that Russian in 19^th century was very backward, and some step of this book can certainly help: “From 1860 the reforms were followed and continuously, more important were: abolition of slavery(in 1861) assize court with elective jury, instead of old tribunals, the creation in 1864, in the cities and campaigns policy institutions local to self administration, and it have had right of self administration to some context of life, example: instruction, hygiene and others. The cities worked to schools with laical tendency, always controlled from State, and religion was present, but a margin of freedom was allowed, because teachers were elected from zemstvo, this is institution of self-government, sanitary conditions of cities, and of streets and others. But although important these reform were very weak, certainly much was changed but others fields were equal: the freedom of talk and print was same, this is nothing, right to meeting and organization, and the workers haven’t right, and owners land were dominant, absolutist State was same. The slavery was abolished but the reform has been very weak, because the strong reform has been weakened from owners lands…Alexander 2th (the zar) wonted absolutely damage interest of his aristocracy, and these reforms were wanted to fair of revolution…”. The revolution was delayed; but the roots of soviet revolution was in these reforms, in these compilation and return to old State; because Lenin(1870-1924) completed these reform, but after he turned to old State because some liberties was abolished, for example liberty of print and meeting and other, and vote, because in 1920 elections given to Bolshevik party alone 5 percentage, and elections was deleted; therefore these historical way is go ahead and go back, some liberty was allowed but very little from zar, and after same condition; but more died 80 millions.

Alessandro Lusana

 

 

Protagonist

Roger was writing a story, fantasy history, and he was searching an original matter, something that was innovative, and he from some days has crisis of writer, because nothing ideas, nothing argument; he has searched among chronicle and personal experience, but nothing; he was drinking a liquor, when he heard a voice, very clear and distinct, that has said: “Don’t drink foolish”, Roger turns about in the room and he didn’t identify provenience of this voice; he thought that it is certainly effects of whisky, and he seat again and took his pen, in front of white paper, he closed eyes. Somebody was knocking on his right shoulder, he turn immediately and he seen a figure of medieval warrior; he got up immediately and faired: “Who are you?”, and shadow: “Your ideas, you have taught that I could an ancient roman soldiers, so”, and it was a ancient roman soldier with shield, gladius and armor, and: “or I can be a teen of Renaissance, or soldiers of your revolution in 1775, why not? Washington the president, or Amerigo Vespucci, or better Giovanni Caboto, that has landed in Virginia in 1497, and he was the first European that has touched this country, or no?”. Roger was stunned, he looked this figure that changed his body and his cloth very soon, and Roger reacted very impulsively: “Who the fuck are you?”, and shadow looked intensity Roger and: “I am from your brain, I am your ideas, I am you, but with other cloth and voice, and I can suggest to you some matter or history, I am your external fantasy, I live because you want it”, Roger therefore said: “I won’t you”, and shadow while is smelling and flower: “Very good perfume of this flower, why do you don’t give deodorant in this room, and second break to smoker, you are rising your life; what do you think of Hippocrates” and he became soon an old man with bard very long and tunic, in conformity ancient cloth. Roger by now habited of this presence seated and said: “What do you want?”, and shadow: “I want that you write an history very original, and you must write it about me”, Roger looked shadow and said: “I can write about Hippocrates and Caboto, Vespucci, Washington and other, what do you think?”, and shadow: “You haven’t understood a the fuck, in conformity to your habit”. Roger very hungry: “How can I write about you, I don’t know you?”. Shadow while looked the wall of room and painting, answered: “Do you ask me it? You are the write, you must find a story and in this tell we are protagonist, good lucky love, goodbye”, Roger turned to lector and said: “You are going to know history when I end it. Goodbye!”

Alessandro Lusana