The Hegelian contradictions of the mathematics

Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel(1770-1831) certainly isn’t never has studied mathematics, he was a philosopher, hence this science was very far from his preference, but we can consider his description of the Subjective and Objective Spirit; the question is automatic, so what? Simple the study of mathematics is a theoretical study, because in the nature the perfect square isn’t or other geometrical form, and it is the first contradiction, because we can take s real and concrete theory, and we apply it to the theory, but it is a contradiction of mathematics, because it is alone our, but I think that we can survive after this contradiction; anyway the principals contradictions is other although similar, what is? Simple it is so: a mathematician explains his matter that is theoretical, and this matter that is always theoretical so is also after the explication, because a perfect square in nature isn’t, I want precise, I have said in nature, and not produced from the man, because a perfect square table is made from the man, but not certainly from the nature, although the material is natural; I want evidence that the contradiction is in this step, this is the mathematics is theoretical and from the theoretical it remains theoretical, because the translation in the reality isn’t, because in the reality isn’t the mathematics, that is a convention, that is necessary as the arithmetic, but the survival of the mathematics is determined from the needs of men, because otherwise it would be disappeared; but for the Subjective and Objective Spirit the mathematics is a contradiction, because this science is theoretical, hence it goes out from brain, this is from the Subjective Spirit, but not can’t be translated to the Objective Spirit, because is alone theoretical, therefore is impossible that it becomes real, because in nature the mathematics not exists, the example of table above is real; the contradiction is in the its theoretical nature that from the Subjective goes back to the Subjective, because in reality isn’t. Whereby the translation of Hegel form the Subjective to Objective in the mathematics can’t be, because from the theory it goes to theory, also if very much have written about the mathematics is untranslatable to reality, in fact Euclid(4^th.3th b.Ch. century has alone written the geometry, and the Egyptian people has alone kept in the theory the geometry, but real, concrete it isn’t; the realization of this matter is alone when the use is necessary, but it remains alone theoretical, and it remains because necessary, although alone theoretical. The Subjective Spirit of Hegel is remains alone in itself, and for this concept we can take Aristotle, this is the think of the think that can think alone itself, because in itself everything contains, that is a translation (evidently during the 4^th century.Ch., in Athens the translation was allowed, but Hegel was not born, then it was possible) of the word of ideas of Plato, that through Aristotle becomes the think of the think; anyway I wanted alone stress a contradiction that I have tied to the philosophy.

Alessandro Lusana