I am it: the need of identification

This essay is very wicked because it describes the wit or will of identification of somebody, that during the childhood is normal, but worrying is when it is in adult age; because it is the sign of low personality subject to various influences, that can be positive or negative, and can undermine the develop of personality; in fact during the childhood we are subject to veracious influence above all from our family we can take different influences, both positive and negative, but we have influenced because we haven’t a personality, because our personality is absent, hence we are as air that takes every form of container, or water that has the form of container, we are as the clay, that can be formed from the sculptor how he want, and he can it because the clay is very soft, and our personality is similar the softness is equal, and the influence is the sculptor that shapes us. Who needs of this influence? Simple who hasn’t a personality or has a weak personality, hence he searches sureness for some influence; but it is sign of insurance, because the absence of personality is evident for the direct or indirect influence of somebody or something, and the influence is the involvement can works alone on the weak personality, that are searching a personality, because the to shape their personality is tardy, but although tardy it is going to form it, fortunately because who hasn’t personality never is involved for every influence, positive or negative, I want consider a sentence of a scientist woman Margherita Hack(1922-2013) that said: “That for identification of good and wicked not must be a religion, because if you not know twice you lack of personality”; and it is the dynamic of who hasn’t a personality, because he is subject to every influence, certainly he identify the good and the wicked, but the dominance of his absence of personality overcomes everything, because he want alone a personality this is he want say: “I am it!”, and for him it is the important to be something, not for to be different but alone for to be something, also equal to other; for example: a soldier is equal to other, but his personality is different, he obey as others and he makes that other makes but he is different, very different from others, because his personality is different, but the personality isn’t importance for the army, I have explain this example for to say that also the developed personality can be subject to a major influence, same the priests and the popes, that can have their personality, but they must obey to superior orders, hence they are equal to others but their personality is very different. The need of identification is necessary to the weak personalities, because they need of something that can identify them, but not for to be different but alone for can say to themselves I am it, it is important, to be something.

Alessandro Lusana