An Italian source of American revolution: Carlo Botta

Contemporary Italian historical men of American revolution, this is the formal act of independence, because the colonies were already independent, because to England were necessary alone the harbors of new word, and no certainly other, the imperator Vespasiano (9b.Ch.-79)took a fistful of money and he set under the nose of his son and asked: “Puteant?”, that translated if :”It stink?”, because Vespasiano was taxed the bathroom in ancient Rome; this example is necessary to explain that a nation, every nation, today as ancient and for future, is interested alone to merchant because its people want alone the money and wealth, hence the British wanted alone the merchant and stop; anyway Carlo Botta(1766-1837), was a historical man that has described the American revolution but alone from documents and other historical scripts, naturally he begun from emigration toward of new word of bannered, and he said: “This crowd of exiled, from England above all, come to north American when the reign was owner of Stuart family…and were founders of colonies of New Hampshire, di Massachusetts, di Connecticut and Rhode Island, that  Botta called Rodi island, and these colonies called themselves New England, and after the Virginia and New York, Pennsylvania, Delaware and county of Maryland and Carolinas”, this the North Carolina and South Carolina, and after  he mentioned also Georgia; some personal think that neither we neither Botta can proof, when he said: “We don’t believe that because they came in other place, where they were born for odd towns and searching better condition of life, they quit their country as enemies…”; we can comment or asked to Botta: “Why they came to new word? Because the wealth was better? No certainly, may because they were free? May, or they came as seamen and after the landed they decided that the transfer wasn’t so bad?”. A man, that is equal always in every period of history, can choose something for very much motives; and the persecutions toward religious minority is a cuck up, because the England was a country that in north, this is the Scotland were Catholic, and Elisabeth, queen of England, begun not a war for religion of Scotland, because she would have determine a civil war, and in Rome, Italy and the Spain wanted alone it, so that through motive of religion they would have attacked, and the England would has become a Spain colon; Elisabeth 1th(1533-1603) as Philip 2th(1527-1598) and pope Saint Pio 5th(1566-1572), thought politically After these words Botta in fact said: “Beyond the customs and the manners of common country, they brought also the privileges of real authority all conferred…”; but we can doubt also of this affirmation because if the royal power had given so much privileges, why they gone away? May my opinion that they were sailormen is more right. A contradiction is evident the step of Botta said: “But for the religion they enjoyed of major freedom in confront to the first country…and being this motive the principal cause to their departure…”, but we can stress to Botta that he has written: “…they brought also the privileges…”; the major freedom is contrary to privileges that they has had in their country. The revolutionary faith of Botta emerges, although hide in following words: “…since nothing province or colony has had an assembly of represent elected from the people…”, the revolutionary faith I want refer to the French revolution, that Botta held convince; furthermore: “Hence it doesn’t amaze us because this generation of men have had their brain toward those credence that are the ground and principles of England govern, but they wanted a manner of govern more free…”, but if they refused the oppressive British govern, they would have refused everything that the England govern has had. The following step has also a psychological note: “…from that fervor that be born naturally in hearth of men, and from the obstacles that are contrary to their opinions both politic and religious…”, it is the hide note of psychology, because in front of the contrary the wit of man becomes fanatic of his opinion, in fact Thomas Mann(1875-1955), has said that the major difficulty for the political propagandist is convince himself rather other; and this think is historical represented from the colons from England, because they used the same model of original country; we must add also that this model was the unique that the colon known; but the participation of people to election of assemblies was very limited, because the vote was destined alone the landowners, therefore the free was very limited; but Botta has took the French revolution, when the elections were frequent, and the people was called to vote. Regard to give the tax from owner will Botta describes the birth of the assemblies, he says: “…of give their money alone from their will…for this are born the assemblies in every colonies…”. The oppression that Botta suggested is in fact a moral custom, as we can infer: “…Everything on the contrary in England America regarded a largest unusual of social life; everything appeared near to favor to freedom civil…”, it is could seem a simple note, that has a difference from English life, and it is the motive of oppression that Botta involuntary confesses through the following words: “…regarded a largest unusual of social life…”; the feral laws of England were alone the moral life, hence the oppression was alone from these moral custom, it is normal that in young colonies of USA, this moral life wasn’t, because it was a youngest nation, actually it wasn’t neither a nation. Regard the religion Botta has forgotten a particular, in the step around the religion of American he said: “The American were the majority protestant, but protestant also against the reliable of Protestant authorities and part of their that in England are called dissident; hence beyond don’t recognize, as Protestant nothing the authority for religion whose decisions are unquestionable…”, it is certainly true, but the particular that Botta has avoid to remember is that already Luther has made it, he didn’t recognized nothing authority. Other particular that Botta or will ignore or will avoid is the following step: “Since the brain of Americans whole free for religion, they used this liberty also for other things, specially in govern matters…In the colonies were abundant the legists, that know take the tiny from the tiny, they are, in a country governed from an absolute prince, the lawyers of his power, and in a free country the useful defender of freedom”, certainly true, but Botta has forgotten that the method is same, the lawyers are same, and other particular that Botta avoided of think, what? The colonies were again too much young to have an owner moral custom and an institution legislative; hence the lawyers that Botta mentions where were is a mystery because may the lawyers could be in the colonies but aren’t the tribunal, and the laws were different form a colonies from other. The inability of Botta after emerges again for other affirmation that is laughable: “…since the study of beauty letters and the noble disciplines has already made the notable progresses in American colonies…”; if I was a fanatic nationalist would stress this affirmation; but the authors of these letters who are? What books they have scripted? Nothing is possible to know! Regard this step other affirmation that is very ridiculous, and that proofs the inability of Botta: “Scant books have the colons, but these between the hands of everybody, treat around the matters of govern or history, and it told also the persecution of Puritan bore. “, the persecution toward the Puritans were, and it implied the emigration to colonies in USA, but the ridiculous affirmation is the. “Scant books have the colons…”, we can remember to Botta that he some lines after has said that in colonies the books were very much. The reflex of the revolutionary wit of Botta, is in the following words: “Those(the Puritans) persecuted in ancient country for their believe for the think around the Church or State and they have decided through a decided deliberation wanted quit it, beyond the immense sea and escaping to more remote and savage regions, so that they could freely show it.”, it is the reflex of French revolution, that in idea was a laic, as in fact was, and where the liberty was very odd in confront to monarchies country; it is hence alone an enthusiastic transfer from the French revolution to colonies.     

Alessandro Lusana    

  

 

 

Prompter

Richard was a writer with usual crisis, and he worked in a magazine very popular and without pride and nobility, a magazine for housewife that pass the day to read cuck up and after they told it to friends; he was very bored and disgusted from this life, and the moment better of day was when he ended his job and he could writer his history, very short tales, with different genres, adventure, love, philosophy, cultural, humanistic and other. From time he has usual crisis of creativity; he didn’t wrote something and was very boring; a Saturday, he was always earl raising, in front of his computer he decided to write, and he concentrated on the white sheet, he thought a tale, and begun to write, but after some line he deleted all and begun again; after some tentative an idea, a history of a teen, Alice, and he thought what tale he could tell; he seen the sheet that alone composed of lines, and he read these lines, that said: “Alice was a teen that attended an private exclusive school, and she dreamed to make the writer; she loved the past writers from ancient Greek to contemporary, she loved read and in hers school she was considered very intellectual, she has written from young age of 10 years old, and now she was 18 years old; some time she read again the first tale and she laughed about the poor histories that she has written, very dingy, but she has, then, alone 10 years old, hence it was justifiable. This history Richard read and read again, and after: “I am Alice, and I am suggest to you a tale, now you must follow”. Richard tried to write something but he was blocked and felt an absence of logic and of a history; suddenly the phone sounded and Richard took the receiver, was the editor that wanted know the level of the next tale because he has wanted publish his tales, Richard told to editor, George, that he was working very well and very much; while he spoke to editor on sheet continued the tale, and same Richard read what that Alice was writing, and in fact the editor asked: “What do you are writing now?”, and Richard: “I am writing the history of Alice”, and George: “Very good, who is Alice?”, and Richard seen that on the sheet shown a face of a teen, and she said to Richard: “Alice is a teen, as I have said to you, above told it, and he wanted become a writer…”, and Richard: “Yes, now I remember…”, and George: “What do you are remembering?”, and Richard: “I remember what Alice is saying to me”, and George: “Are you sound?”, and Richard: “Yes, perfectly, because Alice is saying me the idea”, and George: “Who is Alice?”, and Richard: “The teen of tale, she is writing the tale”, and George: “Where is Alice now?”, and Richard: “In computer”, and Richard: “Just moment I will call the police, don’t worry in jail you con write, just a moment”; and George broken the call phone; while Alice continued to write, and Richard read it. Then minutes after and the doorbell sounded and two policemen gone in apartment of Richard they arrested him and Bernard one of police men begun read the tale, he seated and Lionel other policeman called him, but Bernard was seated and continued the read, hence Lionel approached to him and he also begun the read, while Richard was waiting; other policemen gone in apartment and everybody read the tale of Alice, and to the morning, in 2 a.m., a district of police arrived to apartment of Richard, and also they read; finally beyond 150 policemen were guest of jail, and George, the editor, published these tales with name of author, this is Alice.

Alessandro Lusana       

 

           

 

 Portrait of a city: moral relativism

Jay McInerney(1955) in the Bright lights, big city is a portrait of a city, in this case New York, but the author a particular attention to daily behavior; after a night in a night club the protagonist, involuntary met a woman with curlers and a dog, that when sees the protagonist he become vigilant; the comment is: “It is normal for a dog!” and answer: “Certainly, but the description so accurate, and punctual that hasn’t importance in history, is a moment of mere realism”, as the scent from a bakery; as the description of emotion that every couple has felt during the first rapport, alone and already married; it is alone the prime experience that every couple makes, this is living together almost an experiment to tried new experiences and above all, consider if the matrimonial life is going to be nice, and the protagonist looked the windows of fourth floor, and the description translates what we can feel in similar episode: “Behind those windows is the apartment that you have shared with Amanda, when you was arrived in New York. It was small and dark but to you liked the ceiling…”, voluntary or no the author describes the emotions that in conformity Marcel Proust’s(1871-1922) code, that in his romances, La recherché, he described the emotions and images that are tied to some moment, and that we keep in our memory, and that reemerge when we have a experience as a scent, an image, a scene, a taste; it is the realism, mere realism, and other images: “You have had money to rent, your preferred restaurant…every morning you have waked with the scent of bakery. You gone out to buy the journal…it is occurred two years ago before that you have married”; I think that the author has took personal memories, that confirms what I have said, because the life that, after years, become mechanical, is so, the behavior of protagonist is portrait every man in the word, hence more than a portrait of a city it is the portrait of word. Other characteristic that if think, I have very much despise, is the use of sniff that the author describes and with very much particulars; it is the moral relativism of title; because the use or dependence of drug is mean of weakness, that during this romance is evident above all in meeting in night club or other places; but also it is life of a city. As is a involuntary meeting or overbearing manner of a crazy that has seat on knee of a lady, and around is indifference, the author describes the reaction: “Almost every passengers are looking the scene but they feign of don’t see”, it is behavior of whom will not problems. The attention of protagonist is took from a announce of a disappeared with description and painting, while the green of traffic light appears. It is more than a romance is a size of labor day. The following tale is a experimented realism but in job, and the author concentrated the attention of emotive dynamic, hence from external realism he took the internal truth; but it is always realism.

Alessandro Lusana 

 Medieval lesson

Michael awaked a Sunday and he was early raising, he opened the door and he was in a city that he didn’t know, where the people was very strange because they spoke a strange language and somebody indicated to him a build and he gone to it, he gone in and seated on the chair, and he heard the lesson, in fact the professor was in desk and he spoken about some difficulties of medieval documents: “The documents begun always to invocation to God, In nomine Dei(in name of God), after the date of document, this is the year, day and indiction”, and Carl, a student: “What is the indicion?”, and the professor: “The indiction is period of 15 years, that the notary used to date every documents, and after 15 years it started again”, and George, other student: “What is In presentia infrascriptuorum testium?”; and the professor: “When the plaintiff were present in front notary, their names have to write, with name of father”, and same George: “Why name of father, it is enough the last name”, and the professor: “During the Middle age isn’t the last name, alone the patronymic”, and Albert other student: “When were used the last names”, and the professor: “When after the reform of Luther, the Church wanted the registers of birth and death, that was called Status animarum”, and after: “The state or number of souls”, and other student: “Why they used alone the Latin language?” and the professor: “Because these documents were alone to notaries, as today if somebody has a document from a tribunal, he bring it to a lawyer, because the lawyer knows what is, and we must consider that then the illiteracy was a the principal character”, and Gerald, a student: “They have to not gone to school?”, and the professor: “The schools were alone to richness families, and the monks and priest made lessons to childes so that they learned the letters, but the poor families, have destined their sons to other jobs”, and a student girl Germaine: “Who taught to write beyond the priests?”, and the professor: “The convents where the childes were educated to Latin language, to theology and philosophy”, and same Germaine: “Why they have shown the vocation?”, and the professor: “No absolutely, the families were composed among much sons, hence it have to send somebody in convent, also to have the protection of God”, and Edward: “Why much sons if they were poor?”, and the professor: “because were necessary the hands to farmer job”, suddenly the bell sounded and it is meant the lesson was ended. The following lesson was to ancient Roman history, and suddenly the light turn off and after some moment it turn on, and the students were in senate of ancient Rome, in 64^th years b.Ch., and they seen a man that wore a chiton and he begun his oration through these words: “Quo usque tandem abutere, Catlina patient nostra…”; and Laura asked to a student near to her: “Where are we?”, and Andrew, the student, answered: “We are in Roman senate in year 64^th b. Ch., and that man is Cicero”. Laura hence to be silent and heard.

Alessandro Lusana          

 

 

A marriage

George and Annie were married from 12 years and as the couple, they every evening he read the journal and she was usually in front the television, by now were ended the arguments, the politic, the sport, that didn’t interested twice, some discussion again about the some comment about the discourse of one politic or major of a city, he was an architect and she a secretary, without sons, but Annie loved read and sometime, it was a need of communication to hers husband or alone the need of communicate to somebody hers feel or emotions; anyway they were a common couple, that has owner interest, Annie told the episodes amusing occurred in office or some gossip, as the director of office that was failed in love for a lawyer, young and very beauty and also very clever, but she have already a crowd of lovers to back, and she was interesting alone the law and win the lawsuits and neither, hers name was Isabell and she was very aseptic, somebody has never seen laughs her, she was high, tiny and very precise, and thank to hers beautiful she became reliable of lawsuit, also because she had two specializations for penal and civil right, and seems that nobody has fucked her, never, she has married to the law; during a daily hour of job, Isabell called Annie and she, very soon, got up and took the dossiers run very swift to Isabell, that was speaking to telephone when Annie knocked to door; Isabell enabled to access, and Annie waited that she has ended the call phone, Annie opened the file and Isabell read and she gazed a step: “One years alone?”, and Annie: “The director has said…”, but Isabell interrupted and commented: “No, absolutely here is necessary the capital pain”, and Annie toward the author: “You have merited it, and I am not sorry, actually I am very happy”, and the author: “Why?”, and Isabell: “Because is half page that you are telling about very much cock up, about the marriage of Annie and George, their jobs, their daily life, about my very well ass, but when we are going to say something? Shit!”, and the author: “A moment, I must describe…”, and Annie: “Fuck you!, I am here in job as secretary, and neither exist, Isabell isn’t because you have invented alone, George my husband is a coach of soccer and no certainly an architect, I hate the read, the last book that has read was…Isabell, what is the last book that I have read?”, and the author: “May…”, and Isabell: “Shut, talkative”, if you say other word we are going to go away, and stop, you are a pain in the neck, and stop!”, and the author: “Ja full!”, and while they are speaking, the author: “Can I bring to you…”, and Annie: “Fuck you, shut and must be shut”. Hence the author gone away.

Alessandro Lusana            

 

Artist in the history: Konrad Fiedler

During the past century it was usual consider the artist as a kind of human that lived in the his word, where he imagined and created, independently from other causes form himself; nothing was more false of this concept and idea, because the artist was in the history, in the town, in the word and he was attentive to gain an job, costumers and other; hence the artist was the human that was present in the history; its natural, following the comments, but a historical art man as Roberto Longhi(1890-1970), at last in Italy, was the idealist exponent, although didn’t declared, of this address, that has took directly from Hegelian philosophy, and the in literature, was exponent otherwise idealist Benedetto Croce(1866-1952). But we can consider that sometime also a historical art man as Konrad Fiedler(1841-1895), that was born and grown up in the moment influenced from Hegel(1770-1831), and his idealism he, in the principal book Uber den ursprung der kunstlerisschen tatigkeit, has ascertained that that the artist is in the history, and these words are the proof: “These stressed the rapport of man to word that surrounded. Because if every explication about the nature of creation of art are unsatisfactory, the unique hope of find a new solution to this old problem, it is to go back to rapport of man to the external word…”; it is certainly isn’t a daily problem, but purely intellectual and directly reportable to the critic of art; but who has read the art history during years and has read sometime, no certainly always, the ideal consideration of artist, it is an ease and surprise, because it preview usually that the idealization of artist is usual as false consideration. This new address of interpretation of art history, in opinion of Fiedler: “It want above all a change from origin in the conception of man to external word…”; it is further ascertainment of the artist is a man. I must also consider that this concept is repeated constantly for the book, and from original it become boring, but we must also think that the originality of this idea, then, was very important and represented a novity, because contrasted the dominant Hegel’s Idealism; and we can also consider that this consideration of humanity and historic nature of artist, Fiedler has translated in more interpretation, because he took the element of feel, this is sensation: “The human gender is able of sensations and perceptions, and he took only effects that he transformers to goods of conscience.”, it is the preclara indication that the humanity of artist, fortunately, is present and the artist, as everybody, is subject to feel and emotion, that he takes also from the society, that Fiedler not mentions but when he talks of artist in the history, he implied the society, hence the human gender.

Alessandro Lusana

 

 

In fabula

Robert was a writer of kind tales, and he was writing a tales and in the room, suddenly the dark failed; Robert among oaths, because it was occurred often, he got up from chair and gone toward the door, he opened it and he was in a fairy tale land; he very much amazing, turned around and he recognized something that he has told in his tales; he seen a dragon, an unicorn, a griffon, a phoenix and a siren, that he seen when he gone near to a river; Robert gazed hers and out loud said: “It is a siren, hence I am in a fable, as I written and I am writing, but it is very impossible, because dragon, phoenix,  and griffon don’t exist”, and the siren said: “We are here, therefore we exist, you think that we are alone mythology creatures, but we are in your mind, and whereby we are present here.”; and Robert more gazed the siren and after he looked the land, he seen a modest house, no very long, and he ran two steps and he was in that house, where an old lady looked him and said: “Finally you are arrived, because is very much time that I am waiting you, here we go again, also when you have to homework, usual you become unobtainable”, Robert gazed attentively the lady and. “And you was the usual pain in the neck, usual magister that you are always been, from the elementary schools”, and the old lady: “Because I have had some nephew that didn’t want make the homework, a guy, the name may was Robert, but you don’t know him”, and Robert: “No, I haven’t known, but may he was a saint boy, since he has bore you”, and the old lady: “Borne, I repeat borne, no bore, your clue is bore!”, and Robert: “Director, excuse me but bore or borne? It is same thing, or no?”, and the director: “It is borne but is same, anyway we can continue or no?”, and Robert toward the director: “Jack, just a moment because I need of bath”, and Jack: “Yes while we read again the cues”, and Robert exited from the bath and he seen the same land and siren and others animals, he was indifferent, he opened a door and seen the same siren, dragon, phoenix, and griffon, he searched some technic to ask something but nobody was, thereupon: “Somebody, please”, nobody answered, the land was desert and he seen the same house and he gone toward, opened the door and he seen the same old lady that repeated the same words, that has said in the scene, and Robert: “The cue was bore and no borne, I have it in my mind”, the old lady gazed him and he: “Helen we must begin again form the last cue”, and the lady gazed him attentively, and Robert: “Helen, are you among us?”, and the lady: “Who are you?”, and Robert. I am Robert, protagonist of this tale, and you are Helen the pain in the neck granny, do you remember?”, and the old lady, silently gazed him, Robert turned around and he seen alone the walls of house, but nobody technic, the director and walk on part and other; he begun to worry himself because the choreography was changed, and he turned continuously around, and he ascertained that all was changed, and out laud: ”Where the fuck I am now?”, and he gazed the old lady, and given the same question, and the lady: “On the set, and you today and you today were fourteen years, and you have had a big dread”, Robert after some moments: “Can I say fuck you?”, and Helen: “Certainly, but we are going follow you, because you are the protagonist”.

Alessandro Lusana