You are…

Life of a secret agent is very hard, and Michael was a secret agent that has been

employed everywhere, and he have to change very often his identity, today he was

George, and tomorrow Richard, after Arthur and other; he did his job with passion

and right spirit; he have made always to serious questions and he did always with other identity. A mission was very dangerous and he was hurt, and he was brought to hospital in European city, he was saved by a very good surgeon; and he with anaesthesia he slept very much, and an image met him during a dream; a woman with a multicolored cloth showed to him and asked: “Excuse me, I am conscience of a man but I don’t who is he, can you aid me?”, and Michael have turned around and asked: “I know identity of very much persons, I know very well presidents and policy men and actors and actresses tycoon and other, but Michael I think that I didn’t know him, who is he?”, and woman answered: “I don’t know, it’s very strange because I am conscience of Michael, but I can’t explain to Michael who is he because I don’t know and I didn’t know him”, and Michael: “If you are my conscience you are who I am!” and woman: “Do you are who are you?”, and Michael answered: “Certainly!” and woman: “Well, who are you?”, and Michael hesitating: “I am…, I am, nobody”, and woman: “No, absolutely, you are somebody because you are nobody, because if you was somebody you would be somebody, but is very important to be nobody because it is very difficult, then you are nobody and very much persons then you are nobody but you have your identity because you are nobody, and you must live because somebody exists because you exist, then you aid millions of persons to be somebody. Compliment.” And woman disappeared immediately.

Alessandro Lusana 

                   

 

 Nobody

Socrates walked on the streets and he looked around because that city, very great was very strange for him; and a policeman watched him and understood that he was foreign he approached and asked: “What’s problem?”, and Socrates: “I haven’t problems because I am nobody, then I can’t have problems or I can have it because I am nobody and then I am somebody”, policeman has got handcuff and he showed to Socrates it and: “Do you want it?”, and Socrates asked: “Do you want arrest Socrates or nobody?”, policeman then called other policeman, while some person was around both, because interested to this scene, they have thought that it was publicity, and in fact somebody has asked: “What is publicity? Are you actor or singer?”, and Socrates: “No I am nobody as Socrates”, and this guy: “I don’t think it, you are nobody and Socrates?”, and Socrates: “Yes, nobody but I am somebody, because I am present and it isn’t if you know me or not, I am somebody not certainly for you, but very much persons has known me, although nobody has known me after 399 a.Ch., in fact if I confess my name somebody that has known me trough my example he is going to think that I am crazy”, and guy: “Then?” and Socrates: “I am nobody for you and very much other, but I am somebody as very much persons that have lived”. Guy has objected: “If you are nobody, you are nobody and stop”, and Socrates: “I am nobody because you don’t know me as very much persons, but if you know me or not I am somebody, because if you think very well this concept, is very difficult to be nobody, because you have an job, you have a personality, you have a think, then you are somebody”, and guy: “Yes but nobody knows me”, and Socrates: “Do you know very much persons” and he has indicated persons around; and guy answered: “No certainly”, and Socrates: “Then they are nobody as you are nobody, but everybody knows somebody”, and guy: “Whom?”, and Socrates: “Himself, then you know yourself, then somebody knows you, and stop”. Socrates looked around among crowd and he has chosen a way and he has gone away.

Alessandro Lusana                   

 

 

Two Frenches consecutive

Although second for time I consider first Anatole France, this is Jacques François Anatole Thibault(1844-1924) as first example of follower of Honoré de Balzac(1799-1850); Anatole catches from Balzac his accurate description around episode and discourses very marginal, and with some  very partial interest, the reader is, may, caught for some moment, but after all disappears for some description very useless around some behaviour that hasn’t importance for romance, this is The red lily; we can consider alone that clear influence of Balzac, I think from Le Père Goriot(1834), is evident, it is sufficient to read romance of Balzac  and all this comment going to find confirmation; all is built around to scenes of real life, but real life of high middle class, as this step: “…the lady Garain, whit the chin bowed, sloped in the peace  of her housewife soul, and she has though to her garden on the hillock of Senna river, when gone musicians for to great hers…”, some lines before argument was the shooting of seventh thousand men; a boring life, certainly, very real life at Belle Époque, that Balzac caught with very spirit and he translated to Human comedy; then we can consider this romance as a following of Comedy of Balzac, because characters that we find are too adherent to reality, that boring reality of Balzac, and his charatcters.

Alessandro Lusana       

                 

 

 

Semiotic suggestions

Johann Gottlieb Fichte (1762-1814) has been a German philosopher that at 1794 written a pamphlet with title Doctrine of science, and he explained some concept very important for a discipline that, after, is officially is named as semiotics, this is study about sign and mean of sign, sign that we, her, must consider with all means, this is it isn’t alone means of language but all signs; this is about a written romance, this is style, style of painting and then his author, that in art critical is attribution, style of architectural building to search name of architect, or about medicine all sign of symptoms, daily weather we can preview a thunderstorm or muggy. This concept we can find, but alone for language in book of Fernand de Saussure (1853-1913), that adopted this concept for language, but he remarked also mean of language and signifying, this is what is mean about a text; an expression that can assumes some mean or other mean in determined contest, then to change all mean of a discourse if we rapport this word to a context. Importance of word and his mean is suggested also by Fichte; a step of Doctrine of science he says: “Nothing proposition is possible without content or without form…it must be certain immediately and for itself; and this means that, except that the content determines his form and reciprocally his content; this form agrees to content and this content agrees to content”, and other step says: “In the proposition The gold is a matter, that we know something is gold and matter…This is an affirmative proposition and this relation is his form…this first principle of Doctrine of science must have form and contest…this must be certain immediately and to itself, and this must means that the his context determines his form, and form the context…This form agrees alone to this context”; these words seem absolutely obvious, but these are ground of semiotic think, because a context is rationally reportable to a form alone; then a word in a text is reportable to a context alone, but if we change context same word is different, then his semiotic valour is changed, then the form and context change every content, but this is semiotic.

Alessandro Lusana

       

 

Satanic epicurism

 Reading of satanic bible, we can know the Epicurism think, this is a very assumption of dictates that we can find in Epicure Letter around felicity or letter to Meneceus that Epicure started with these words: “Never we are too young or old to know felicity, during all ages is very well that we work for our soul”. Furthermore, he has said: “The goods are, it’s evident, but they aren’t in opinion of common people that wrong always around them”. These steps of Epicure’s letter are very resembling with dictates of satanic bible that says, except existence of God, that felicity for man is to get pleasure and he says: “The wise as he dislike to live he doesn’t fear death…as foods he gets alone better, and he doesn’t choses quantity but alone quality”. Furthermore, he says: “We must remember that all future isn’t our, but it isn’t all not ours. So we can think that it doesn’t happens and we disliked for contrary”. So far, we have considered Epicure, and I am going not to mention satanic bible, but some step is very interesting for some concept that this book expresses; in fact satanical bible says that man is natural creature, then he must follows alone his natural needs, and he must live with satisfaction of these needs, but he is independent from all religion, in fact satanic religion is, if we want consider it with religious meaning, as an atheist bible, because all text is around freedom of man and around satisfaction of his natural habit, food, sex and other; we can notice, during reading, that in satanical creed neither God neither Satan are present as deities, in fact author, this is Anton La Vey, says that man must live alone for independent life, and if he want can makes something otherwise not; he denies common opinions around satanical creed, and other. It’s seems common opinion of Epicure around divinities, that we have seen before, and felicity and future depend by our directly, as La Vey says around satisfaction and our future that we can get now with our work, but without think to future punishment or other that can distract ous to our life that must be like and independent. Epicure says: “The strong knowledge of our desire let that we can chose for our body and our soul, because it’s duty of happy life, and we address every work to it”, same concept that we read in the satanical bible. Feurbach (1804-1072) a German philosopher is present in this book because satanical bible denies every deities, and in fact Feuerbach is mentioned on the step: “God didn’t man but man didn’t God”. 

Alessandro Lusana 

   

 

 

Past and future

A man was arrested by policemen and brought him to police department, he seen around and, above all he seen cloth of policemen and other persons, he seen policemen, junkies, pusher and other; but he seen whit much interest. Policeman brought him to interview room, and he seen with very much black astonishment a policeman, and this policeman was astonish because it seems that this arrested didn’t see a black. Inspector given some questions: “Are you from?” and arrested answered: “Sparta”, and inspector tough that this city was in Tennessee, and he asked again: “Where do you live?”, and arrested answered: “To my home to Sparta”, and he continuously seen around, then inspector: “Hi mate, you all right?”, and arrested: “This is strange town, where are we here?”, and inspector: “You are in police department, and we are policemen”, and arrested: “Are you Spartited?”, inspector seen other policeman and: “What’s your name?” and arrested: “Leonidas, king of Sparta”. Inspector seen astonish policeman and he commented: “He is crazy”, and inspector, that known same historical data, continued others questions: “When are you king of Sparta?” and arrested: “From 490 to 480, and my father was  Anassandrida”, and inspector: “Do you have fought at Thermopiles, and you are died there”, and Leonidas: “I am here and don’t seem myself died”, and inspector: “Can you tell history of fight of Thermopiles”, and Leonidas: “Yes, I can. Magistia seer told that we are going to die after, and I have sent back very much men, and I have made it because I seen to their eyes very fear; but I have kept warriors of Taspia; Persians came forward and we came versus to us, and we came for a wide gorge, and Persians came versus and very much men and warriors died, and two brothers of Xerxes died”, then he got up and opened the door, and inspector asked: “Where are you going”, and Leonidas: “To future, instead you are in the past”, Leonidas got out from district, and inspector followed him, but when he was out door, he seen an army with swords and shields, he seen them and asked: “Where am I? And a soldier approached to him answered: “Thermopylae, and we want you order Leonidas”.

Alessandro Lusana     

                                                                     

 

 

Difficulty of nothing

This concept has got much times and as much thought\; I follow think of Plato swears that nothing is no be, and it is very true, also Gorgias said that no be is an entity; in fact also no be is an name and rational concept, for example: we must consider that nothing is against all or everything, but all exists, with common exception, because there is also nothing, good is present against evil, believer is against atheist, and other; then every concept has one contrary, and to be is philosophical entity also no be, but also no be is entity because it has one nature, a character, then is present, therefore is to be then it is an entity. Johannes Scotus Eriugena(815-877a.Ch.) thinks that nothing is God because he superior every essence then he we can’t consider as essence. Plotinus(205-270a.Ch.) thinks that nothing is the matter, because hasn’t soul, think and life, to Hegel(1770-1831) in every matter and other is present both to and nothing, this is positive and negative also to matter. These think about nothing perorates that nothing is existent, then it is not nothing, but it is entity, both real and philosophical; but where is and where do we can nothing; this is, can we find nothing to everything or no? Can we find nothing to everywhere or no? Other question, how do we consider nothing? I think that nothing is present but with very strong limits; because our think to nothing is or universal, God is nothing, in the opinion of Scotus or is with matter, in the opinion of Hegel; I think that nothing is very difficult to demonstrate because it is very limited, this is to everything is present matter, soul and life, also if it seems very absent, to tree we can’t see life, but it is present; then think nothing is difficult, because absence of matter isn’t nothing; for example, air isn’t matter but it is present, therefore it is present then is essence. In fact we can consider that Plato thinks that isn’t absolutely nothing, but absence of something that is nothing, shadow as absence of light, but he didn’t solve problem, because we can find all but no certainly nothing; then we can consider nothing as philosophical concept, but di difficult to demonstrate.

Alessandro Lusana