The failure of an illusion

A French author Francois Furet(1927-1997) written The past of an illusion, and I don’t want certainly emulate this book but want alone take this title and change it very small, because I want dress the failure of an illusion, this is the failure of end of suggestion that the politic power must gives to itself for the his role, that is alone the administration; the Lutheran reform was a the failure of a suggestion, because it maned that also the Church could be attack, and that revenge of God didn’t occur, and this symbolic episode has determined a revolution in theological contest, why? During the centuries other polemical exponents and movements has worked again the Church, and even the change of the holy seat, from Rome to Avignon, that certainly has major importance rather that a sheet with 95 rules attached to a door of a cathedral; the instrument that has determined this change is likewise important, because a sheet is sufficient to mine the ecclesiastical Church it means the this institution can be fought and destroyed, the suggestion is ended. The Common of Paris in 1871, during the French-Prussian in 1871, Paris had its Common, this is the autonomy of manage, that followed to promises that the Thiers govern didn’t keep; this revolt lasted from 18^th March to 28^th  May 1871; but important is that this revolt has took for example the French Revolution, that has brought a change, very radical, in the political ideology in Europe, and above all the “desacralization” of a myth, or an institution, this is the Monarchy; the Revolution had given the certain that these institutions are alone false and kept from the suggestion that the people has, and stop; when this illusion is failed everything end, and the institution falls; other example, that I have mentioned above, is the French Revolution, 14 beggars attacked the Bastille for to robber the weapons in the prison, and the guardian, for direct order of governor endured the access; but after this episode the revolution burst; some word about this episode, that is nothing absolutely, in fact in historiography of Revolution isn’t remind, because it is ridiculous; but this attack although was irrelevant manifested to people of Paris that the monarchy was touchable, and not certainly unreachable, that has created the French Revolution was the failed of sentiment of desistence that the holiness of monarchy had created, something of unteachable and almost holy; this opinion failed when this attack shown of greatest cuck up that the monarchy represented; the monarchy as the aristocratic class were human, and they were mortal, and the king was a foolish and coward. The last example is the Bolshevik revolution that has destroyed an institution that was already died, as the Czar power, that by now was alone nothing; but in Russian were the reforms that has determined the failure of power, these reforms, type the abolition of slavery, but alone for the defeats that the Russian army has suffered in war of Crimea; but this cunning political strategy, that wanted alone eliminate a danger that was the Republic, but it manifests the weakness of the Russian czar, because the people could rebelled to these defeats, and it have destroyed the monarchy, a State that must avoid a danger is already a died State, because to avoid a danger it means that the State can’t front a danger, hence it is a failure and no certainly a State; therefore the czar Alexander 1th brought reforms because he wanted rescued the failure of Russian, that was already failure, because if was sufficient a man, Lenin, to organize the revolution, that has also the support of army, as Khomeini in Iran, that has asked not lost its identity for to use occidental customs, Khomeini involved the army and organized the revolution, but the Iranian State was already died.

Alessandro Lusana