Revolutionary economy

This essay want alone hints to a particular matter that in historiography about the American “revolution” is always excused; it is right because it is very low important, other episodes are very relevant; it is also necessary to celebrate a normal, not certainly a request but a confirm, will of liberty that was already present in the colonies, today USA, from the 1680, hence a century after this freedom was present from at last a100 years, therefore it is alone a pretext for a revolt that has had some died, a confront to certain date is necessary, during the civil war 750.000 died, and it is major number for every war of USA, the American “revolution” has had 25.000 died, that are always too much, but the number is very short; but the valor of revolution we can’t consider for the died, but alone the results, hence other confront is necessary, to the French revolution in 1789, and the difference is the French become a republic, that then was unthinkable, in fact the unique republic was that the Roman republic, in ancient time; this confront is necessary to stress that the French revolution has brought change very important, but the monarchic state in French was already died; for this a simple revolt was sufficient to this radical change this is the republic; but in USA this radical change wasn’t because the liberty was already present, and the English monarchic power was very long, an Atlantic sea between England and USA; whereby the suffocate a revolt in New Word would be too expensive, because the freedom already was in nascent USA, hence the England considered useless it. Anyway the comment of reader is: “ After this digression, what is argument of this essay? Because you are a pain on the neck”, and I can alone agree to this judge, anyway the argument is the wit of economy during the “revolution”; some step that I have took from the acts of Congress in 1784 keeps reference to economy: “Thursday, December 9, 1784.That a committee, to consist of one member from each state, be appointed to receive the marquis, and in the name of Congress to take leave of him. That they be instructed to assure him, that Congress continue to entertain the fame high sense of his abilities and zeal to promote the welfare of America both here and in Europe…”; it is translated means is alone the commercial exercise, because what is interest of American colonies for the Europe? Rationally nothing, but the words are very explicit if we consider it in their text and context: “to promote the welfare of America both here and in Europe”, it is exemplification to understand this step, because the promotion of merchants both in colonies and in Europe, enables to the colonies the survive and growth of wealth, hence the rapports to Europe was necessary; a historical question is present: “Alone now the nascent USA has considered the importance of Europe as merchant? Because in this paper why can read this reference to Europe; thereby before the rapports aren’t or it are?”, the answer is: “Certainly it was before of “revolution”, because also the colonies can live, and the economy was then as today also the commerce, hence the commerce to Europe was necessary, but is also necessary the welfare of Europe, as mentioned in the text, because otherwise the colonies could not sale nothing, and country poor doesn’t buy nothing, hence was necessary that the Europe has had a welfare; it is the evident sign that the USA was born from at last a century, because this text proofs that the freedom was absolutely objective, why? Simple because the commerce of colonies to Europe would included also the England, but in the text is mentioned alone the Europe, without exclusion of some country, and in political acts everything must be specified, hence if the commerce to England has been deny the text have to specify it, but the welfare was in Europe and England is Europe no certainly on Saturn planet, thereupon the colonies have to commerce also to England: “Pecunia no olet”, this is the money doesn’t stinks, hence also the England could be a source of gain, somebody could ask: “The patriotism”, it is mentioned, in fact: “has resembled that of a patriotic citizen, the United States…”; beyond the patriotism is important also the words that confirm my opinion, this is the USA was a reality, because the name: “the United States”, is a reality, and of this were aware both in USA and in England; anyway the text continues:“which they have frequently expressed and manifested on former occasions, and which the recent marks of his attention to their commercial and other interests have perfectly confirmed. Has resembled that of a patriotic citizen, the United States regard him with particular affection, and will not cease to feel an interest in whatever may concern his honor and prosperity, and that their best and kindest wishes will always attend him. Resolved, That a letter be written to his most Christian majesty, to be signed by his excellency the president of Congress, expressive of the high sense, which the United States in Congress assembled, entertain of his zeal, talents and meritorious services of the marquis of Fayette, and recommending him to the favor and patronage of his majesty.” The noun majesty is alone a respect form, as the colonies that are mentioned in December 1784: “North-American colonies and of the said colonies of New-York and Massachusetts-Bay”, and 1th June 1785, are common name that the Congress has used for a direct and easy identification, but they were aware that of colonies was alone the name. Anyway The USA and the Congress known perfectly that a Revolution or “revolution” isn’t without money, also if somebody must robber Fort Knox. Ulterior again resolution, from other source and now directly from the king of England James 1th, this is the authorization to give the laws: “The honorable owner for the paper o king, he authorized his heritages, with the consent of free men, to give the laws and it publish under his sigil, laws necessary to wealth of people, that aren’t never given under the right form…”.  

Alessandro Lusana