Heritage of human religion

“The Greek religion is to his characters or peculiarities a natural religion, so long as gods are represented for much gods as natural nature and they have one step more than of human gender; then human gender doesn’t need rise for relate to god, rather he feels joint for his own natural. A god doesn’t asks a change of his nature, he doesn’t asks a change of his think and natural tendencies; rather that is natural to human gender is same to a god as right, so is man must make that is accordant to human nature, this mention (E. Zeller, The philosophy of ancient Greek during his historical development)explains what is nature of human religion, and it anticipates the partial humanization of Cristian God, because also God is seized with anger; then men must make that is right, that is natural nature of men and they adhere to will of gods; on contrary in ancient Egypt that rapport to gods was different, were priests and rapport was by this persons, Until now is evident and very known all, but my reflection goes beyond; because rapport to gods was direct, it was natural and then the gods are determined by human gender, at least in ancient Greek, they are human with divine characters, but they are human, that is confirmation of think of Feurbach, the man has created gods, because it is a translation of human characters to divine; on contrary Christianism has alone humanized God and showed more good and indulgent, but it is Greek heritage, this is to make human God but he keeps always his divine nature and he could be also severe, that is Greek heritage, this is very good or severe; then human gender must changes his nature to conformity of orders od God, but Greek religion gods were human just. The Christianism has took some character of Greek religion, this is human nature, but has kept the divine nature typical of Hebrew religion.

Alessandro Lusana    

              

 

 

An actual political man at first century a.Ch.

I consider in this essay is Plutarch, born in Chaeronea at 46 a. Ch. And he died at 127 a.Ch; he has written Parallel lives, live of Greek and Roman, personages of these two cultures that today are known with qualities certainly no common, for example Caesar and Alexander Magnus, Cicero and Demosthenes and other, among this other is also Πολίτικα παραγγελματα, this is Advises to political men is a book with very much advises to political man, Plutarch tells about strategy of politic man, and he considers what are best strategies, and knowledge political man must have about people and enemies and other; he took from his lives and he tells very much episodes about of lives and he justifies his political strategies for these episodes; he speaks about character of people and he explains: “Who has decided to work about policy  must knows perfectly nature of his people this is fellow-citizens , and particular attention to matter that people considers very important”, and other question that Plutarch has given is: “People isn’t controllable every men…it is a miracle if people accepts a leader without annoyed…”, in fact who is leader must be persuasive, in fact he signs: “…political man an necessary intelligence to lead and a persuasive and dialogic capacity to impose orders”, and about discourses and words Plutarch says: “ His discourses must be strong, blunt and genuine, with feels and true purposes…”, but he adds that also humour is necessary, in fact he says: “I am not saying that sometime some quip must be, but it is necessary to answer to critic or offense”. Other question is boredom for same political men: “People is bored for same political want a new man, as spectators welcome very best a new actor…”. Therefore I think that we must consider these strategies necessary to political men and we can consider behaviour of political men determined for these motives, and we can consider other strategy both actual and past for these advises of Plutarch, and we can to note that certainly are changed time and contests but human gender and political strategies are same always.

Alessandro Lusana    

                                                     

 

           

 

 

Inner balance

John was a sociologist and he has studied men and women in the city, this is great city; after a lesson, because he taught in University, he ended lesson and spoken to girl student that asked some explication; he explained some concept expressed during lesson and he invited this girl to drink a tea in fast food in University. So day ended, and John entered home and red some page of journal he lay down on the sofa, and slept. He dreamed that he was in same city where he lived but in this city everything was different; every people greeted him kindly, and much persons asked about his life and his preference, persons that he didn’t know, but they stopped him on the street and asked, he was very astonish, and he entered to University and nobody seen him, nobody spoken to him, nobody recognized him and nobody asked about lessons and other. He was very worried, and he stopped a student that he known and asked: “George, do you want hear my lesson?”, and George answered: “Your lesson? Why? I think that you confuse me for someone else”, and John asked: “Are you George?” and student answered: “Yes, but I don’t know you, sorry”; John was very worry and he has understood that something was different, he has gone to his classroom and he looked every students that he known, and he asked: “do somebody knows me?”, and a student answered: “Yes, all know you but you don’t us because something is changed; very little thing, but your balance, or better your inner balance is changed; you has not had some moment your inner balance; always you have tell about human gender but you have forgotten that you are a man, and you have your inner balance, very weak, because it’s sufficient something changed and you lost reference, security and your assurance; then your certainty is for external habit, and stop”. John looked student and answered: “This is normal”, and student: “Yes, you have taught this concept but you don’t know it, because you have not felt it; then when you lost references, that are normal and conformistic you lost yourself and other, you lost your balance, then you are afraid, then you need of conformistic reference always, because you are weak”. John asked to student: “Who are you?” and student answered: “Your inner balance that you have to consider perfect balance between a stone and a feather, stone is references and feather is our inner balance, very weak and light”.

Alessandro Lusana

                                   

 

Where is my time?

Charles was a knight at 1260 he was usual to awake early and get his sword and make exercise during all day, he exercise bother on horse and feet, he was very robust and courage and reckless. He got up on horse and begun the ride. After one mile he seen skyscrapers and cars; he was very astonished, and he seen around and he didn’t understand what he was looking, and he was more astonished because people was looking him and he asked because this interest, he got off the horse and asked a man that was looking at it with fear because he thought that he was publicity alone, but Charles spoken strange words, and he asked: “Who is lord of this feud? Answer plebeian”, but poor man was scared, and Charles drew his sword and menaced man, and again asked: “Who is lord of this feud?”, man didn’t answered with wide eyes, and a voice answered: “I am lord that you are searching”, Charles turned immediately and he looked a lord with armature and long sword, and Charles asked: “Who are you?”, and warrior answered: “Who you are searching, but I no want fight I want that you go on that street, because it isn’t your time”. Charles gone to border of city and he turned back on his horse and he saw no one, but and great dazzling light took him and he was in other space and time, he saw warriors with short sword and beards, they were concentrated in front for others soldiers that were very strange for clothing, they were, may, oriental; improvise Charles felt a hand on the shoulder and he turned back and he saw a man with beard and hair very long and he said: “From 13^th century to 384 before Christ you have run very much”, and Charles didn’t know where and whom see. Because he asked immediately: “Where am I?” and his guide answered in Jerusalem at 1099, Christian army has conquered the city and they have took holy sepulcher, then now Jarusalem is Christian”; Charles saw very much warriors and celebrations for this conquest; he turned back and he saw the sea and he wanted take a dip; and he dived and when he resurfaced he saw around and he seen a great square and a man fixed on door of church two posters with written much rules that Charles red and he asked to a monk: “What is it?” and monk answered: “It’s disaster but God want it I have written it”, and Charles asked: “What time is it?” and other man next him answered: “We are at 1517, and you are out your time, it is better if you look back”, and Charles made it and he saw again his castle and he ridden on the horse and entered to his castle and he got off the horse and entered to lunchroom, where were very much knocking and they were seated around table, one of them asked: “Charles we are waiting young from very much time, where was you?”, and Charles answered: “Around time”. and he looked faces of  his guests, and he recognized the monk, the guide and everybody worriers and he asked: “Are we met?”, and guide answered: “May, but at other time”, and Charles asked to everybody, while he looking them: “Where is my time?” and citizen that he met during his swim in Jerusalem answered: “same our ask”, and he continued: “don’t worry somebody is going to write this history, and somebody, may, is going read it, but these are problems that don’t concern us” and he by contacting the author: “You write and don’t disturb!”

Alessandro Lusana 

 

 

                                       

 

You are…

Life of a secret agent is very hard, and Michael was a secret agent that has been

employed everywhere, and he have to change very often his identity, today he was

George, and tomorrow Richard, after Arthur and other; he did his job with passion

and right spirit; he have made always to serious questions and he did always with other identity. A mission was very dangerous and he was hurt, and he was brought to hospital in European city, he was saved by a very good surgeon; and he with anaesthesia he slept very much, and an image met him during a dream; a woman with a multicolored cloth showed to him and asked: “Excuse me, I am conscience of a man but I don’t who is he, can you aid me?”, and Michael have turned around and asked: “I know identity of very much persons, I know very well presidents and policy men and actors and actresses tycoon and other, but Michael I think that I didn’t know him, who is he?”, and woman answered: “I don’t know, it’s very strange because I am conscience of Michael, but I can’t explain to Michael who is he because I don’t know and I didn’t know him”, and Michael: “If you are my conscience you are who I am!” and woman: “Do you are who are you?”, and Michael answered: “Certainly!” and woman: “Well, who are you?”, and Michael hesitating: “I am…, I am, nobody”, and woman: “No, absolutely, you are somebody because you are nobody, because if you was somebody you would be somebody, but is very important to be nobody because it is very difficult, then you are nobody and very much persons then you are nobody but you have your identity because you are nobody, and you must live because somebody exists because you exist, then you aid millions of persons to be somebody. Compliment.” And woman disappeared immediately.

Alessandro Lusana 

                   

 

 Nobody

Socrates walked on the streets and he looked around because that city, very great was very strange for him; and a policeman watched him and understood that he was foreign he approached and asked: “What’s problem?”, and Socrates: “I haven’t problems because I am nobody, then I can’t have problems or I can have it because I am nobody and then I am somebody”, policeman has got handcuff and he showed to Socrates it and: “Do you want it?”, and Socrates asked: “Do you want arrest Socrates or nobody?”, policeman then called other policeman, while some person was around both, because interested to this scene, they have thought that it was publicity, and in fact somebody has asked: “What is publicity? Are you actor or singer?”, and Socrates: “No I am nobody as Socrates”, and this guy: “I don’t think it, you are nobody and Socrates?”, and Socrates: “Yes, nobody but I am somebody, because I am present and it isn’t if you know me or not, I am somebody not certainly for you, but very much persons has known me, although nobody has known me after 399 a.Ch., in fact if I confess my name somebody that has known me trough my example he is going to think that I am crazy”, and guy: “Then?” and Socrates: “I am nobody for you and very much other, but I am somebody as very much persons that have lived”. Guy has objected: “If you are nobody, you are nobody and stop”, and Socrates: “I am nobody because you don’t know me as very much persons, but if you know me or not I am somebody, because if you think very well this concept, is very difficult to be nobody, because you have an job, you have a personality, you have a think, then you are somebody”, and guy: “Yes but nobody knows me”, and Socrates: “Do you know very much persons” and he has indicated persons around; and guy answered: “No certainly”, and Socrates: “Then they are nobody as you are nobody, but everybody knows somebody”, and guy: “Whom?”, and Socrates: “Himself, then you know yourself, then somebody knows you, and stop”. Socrates looked around among crowd and he has chosen a way and he has gone away.

Alessandro Lusana                   

 

 

Two Frenches consecutive

Although second for time I consider first Anatole France, this is Jacques François Anatole Thibault(1844-1924) as first example of follower of Honoré de Balzac(1799-1850); Anatole catches from Balzac his accurate description around episode and discourses very marginal, and with some  very partial interest, the reader is, may, caught for some moment, but after all disappears for some description very useless around some behaviour that hasn’t importance for romance, this is The red lily; we can consider alone that clear influence of Balzac, I think from Le Père Goriot(1834), is evident, it is sufficient to read romance of Balzac  and all this comment going to find confirmation; all is built around to scenes of real life, but real life of high middle class, as this step: “…the lady Garain, whit the chin bowed, sloped in the peace  of her housewife soul, and she has though to her garden on the hillock of Senna river, when gone musicians for to great hers…”, some lines before argument was the shooting of seventh thousand men; a boring life, certainly, very real life at Belle Époque, that Balzac caught with very spirit and he translated to Human comedy; then we can consider this romance as a following of Comedy of Balzac, because characters that we find are too adherent to reality, that boring reality of Balzac, and his charatcters.

Alessandro Lusana