Kantian contradiction

The read of Prologomena for every future metaphysic, a book that Immanuel Kant(1724-1804) written for to explain his The critic of the pure intelligence, because much critics were come to him for the difficult of this book, he has explain the concepts, and he has explained interesting concepts, as the synthetic and analytics judges: for Kant an analytic proportion, or judge, is a judge that not demands the direct experience for to ascertain the truth, for example, I take the Kantian example: the bodies are wide, this proportion is already verifiable without the experience because the bodies are wide and we it know perfectly, because in the concept of body is implicit the dimension of wideness; the single is a man that isn’t married, in the concept of single is implicit that he is unmarried; but instead the proportion or judge synthetic, that in conformity to the think of Kant is the judge add other information that isn’t in predicate, this is: the body is heavy, it add other information, regard the heaviness; hence the se two judges has a rationality certainly, but also a contradiction, that we are going see after, because the last judge is likewise important: the gold is a metal of yellow color; Kant judges this judge is otherwise contradictory than above, because he says: “Every le analytic proportions are the judge “a priori”, although their concepts are empiric, as this judge: “The gold is a metal of yellow color”, because for to know that the gold is yellow I not need of other experience, but I have need alone of my concept of gold, that has itself the affirmation that is a metal and of yellow color…”; and other part of this concept is further contradictory: “…these elements entered for the build the my concept and I have to alone to break up, without turn my eyes to other town, but alone to my concept”; these proportions are a contradiction and neither hide, but evident, because Kant considers alone the abstract concept, the a priori, a Latin proportion that indicates something that is before of direct experience; it is the contradiction of Kant, how we can verify it? Simple, following the daily life; we can aske to a baby of 4 year of what color has the gold, he can’t answer that the gold has the yellow color, because he doesn’t know what is the gold, because if he know it, he isn’t a baby but a robber disguised of baby; but a true baby can’t answer, because he doesn’t what is the gold and the yellow color; hence this information is directly from the experience that we have made during our growth, and the same for the two first judge, the body we know that is wide because we have seen, for this our image of the body, that is a concept, that we have took from the reality, that we have seen; inasmuch nothing is a priori, but except the imaginary think, the experience is necessary to know the real condition and also for the read and contradict Immanuel Kant.

Alessandro Lusana