Dialectic logic: the stoicism

The other essay about the dialectic, that for me is fight, verbal, physical or other, because alone so we can grow, our opinion, our thinks, and we can think what other has said, also to change our opinion, but for Stoicism, this is that philosophical school born in ancient Greek about 300 b.Ch., founder was Zeno, in opinion of Stoic, that name is from the Stoa, in ancient Greek, this is portico of building where was the school, they anyway this school wanted the first consideration of moral problems, also on daily life, this is the Epicurean ataraxia, this is the absence of passions hence the calm life in medium need without obsessions or utopian will; they has divided their teaching on three address reference, we consider alone that regard the dialectic: the dialectic is logic, this is the science of hypothetical think, whose introduction expresses an objective date, thereupon visible and immediately understandable, for example, following the Stoic dialectic, and the system of their think in regard the evidence of their dialectic, that must begin from evident premises, this is: “Now is morning hence is light. The light isn ‘t now therefore is night”, they identified the dialectic as the science of true and false and that isn’t true and false; it is the deny of the syllogism of Aristotle that in stead wanted the true premises and premises probable that he has used for his syllogism, for Stoic all must be or true or false or neither; it is impossible because something must be or true or false, other isn’t, but the Stoic has though something that become true also in absurd expression, how? Simple they, and it isn’t philosophy but an motive of originality and stop, because the clarification of this judge is ridiculous; in fact the neither false or true is that word in proposition that is single, for example, man, or animal, extern from a contest isn’t true or false, because hasn’t premise and conclusion, hence it isn’t neither; but it is logic, for this isn’t necessary the Stoa is necessary alone the animal intelligence. The difference and origin of this dialectic logic is in the difference between Aristotle and Stoicism in regard dialectic; because the Stoic used the anapodictic concept, from ancient Greek αναπόδεικτος, indemonstrable, because it is evident, as now is morning hence is light, that above we have read; but the origin of this criterion to demonstrate something, has origin in Socrates, because he begun from evident and elementary proposition that after became pure logic, because took from reality; the think of Stoic in regard dialectic is Socratic, purely and merely Socratic.

Alessandro Lusana