Philosophical nonconformism

From a scripto about of Actualism of Giovanni Gentile(1875-1944) he said and defined the spiritual life as: “Whole the spiritual life  what other we can think that it is if not the position of determined moments and stable of same wit?  Spiritual concreteness is always to be in precise form, exacts, limited?” These words are very educative for conformist, because they are going to search always the common position that has security because if everybody makes it is the right; hence he has searched a dimension that is common, this is search of determined moments and fixed of with, this of brain; it is the safety that gives the certainness that something is not right but it is less, or nothing, harmful, because all make it, all think it and thereupon I am in the right, because it is common action; it is conformism and stop. The conformist works in limited space of wit, these are the “precise, exacts, and limited” of Gentile, fundamentally he is an unsafe, because he find his safety in united of works of gather, an psychologist would explain it is the compensation dynamic, this is the safety that is necessary to calm the grief and worries, thereby the nonconformist is who avoids this dynamic, who avoids this safety because is useless, why? Simple, because I can see from external the other behaviors or behavior, because the conformists follow the same precise form. The non conformist is explained involuntary fro same Gentile, although he didn’t called so: “Since neither the multiplicity, neither the determination of spiritual reality is excluded from the concept of progressive unity of with during its develop”; Gentile has explained the nonconformist, the aske is: “how?” Simple through the some word, it are: “during its develop”; it seems alone an unfinished proposition, but it is really a truth of nonconformist, because the develop of wit, that is in unfinished proportion that we have read has an substantive that is the secret of with, this is the develop; John Locke(1632-1704), was an British philosopher, and in his book Essay on human intelligence he said that the with is projection of brain in interior form; hence we enriching the brain limited the unsureness and limited the worry and griefs and we can annihilate the conformism, because we have other sureness, this is the capacity of analysis that is an other dynamic compensation different from that has the conformist, that follow the crowd because in it he find the sureness, nonconformist has the safety in his wit, this is in his brain, in conformity of opinion of Locke; whereby the develop of wit is to annihilate the “precise and exact and limited forms”, of Giovanni Gentile. The last philosophical reference is Socrates because he, differently from all philosophical schools during 5^th century b.Ch. in Athens, he wanted the develop of with through the brain, he didn’t give a truth but he given the method necessary your truth, it is evidences that Socrates has had reached a spiritual develop very important, in fact he wasn’t conform to common teaching but absolutely different, truly different, because he wanted that you find your think, in fact he hasn’t never spook about the ideas word, but Plato, that was his pupil has though it and has written about this word.  

Alessandro Lusana