Personal phylosophy

We are wont usually think that a philosophical think is a learn to other, and a book with title Deep history and the brain of Daniel Lord Smail, should induce us to consider that also the philosophy is a personal think that come from personal conditions, and the think certainly influenced, it is enough consider the influence of Aristoteles during much centuries; but the philosophical speculation of Aristoteles is come from personal qualities that his followers and pupils didn’t have; in fact commentators of works of stagirita, this is from Stagira, actual Olympiada, in Macedonia, is Alexander from Afrodisia, that is and rest alone a descriptor of works of Aristoteles; he is a Aristotelian scholar, but he is very limited to his comments to Aristoteles works; in fact he describes alone and a comment to think of master isn’t, why? Because he hasn’t had the intellectual possibility of Aristoteles; to Socrates same dynamic; in fact every his pupils, more famous is Plato, has followed the think of master; he during process said that the pupils interrogated the citizens and imitated him, but in history of philosophy nobody has followed Socrates and his think, why? Because nobody has had qualities of Socrates, his intelligence and his rational and speculative capacity; thereby also the philosophy is a building very deep, from personal conditions, fantasies and intuitions that come from personal qualities. The intuition of Democritus and Leucippus about the smaller piece of matter, this is atom, is today valid but nobody has followed them, the think of these two philosophers is very important after centuries, but then nobody has considered their intuition, why? Because nobody has qualities of Leucippus and Democritus, and thereupon nobody has developed this think, why? Because nobody has had qualities of these philosophers, and when somebody has followed the think of a philosopher has personalized this think, a clear example is same Aristoteles, that has been pupil of Plato, but his philosophical think is very different from Plato, radically different; it is sign of intelligence no certainly common, but pupils of Plato and Aristoteles had not same intelligence, thereupon they have commented or alone read the works of these philosophers, thereby the passion and interest to philosophy was evidently scarce or nothing and their intelligence may very superficial. The philosophy is human and deep built of human kind.

Alessandro Lusana