Courses and recourses in history and daily

We usually called habit that is to us normal because we are habituate of something, certainly we didn’t think never, but this action that is repeated is a course and recourses; I imagine answers of reader: “It is logic, but where is original think? You are a fool and stop! Or philosophically you are Kantian follower!”; thank you but I am not drunk of obviousness, and I don’t consider the objective alone. I don’t follow Kant; the original consideration is that it is course and recourse of daily, that we can synthetize with word “experience”; if we think the experience we can pike some episode that is turned similar or equal is similar or equal condition; it is course the first time and recourse the second time, thereupon: experience. This discourse has a sense, because a Italian philosopher, Giambattista Vico(1668-1744) has said about course and recourse of history, in The new science, this is the history, that is human build and long its run the similar or equal contexts are present, and the man works with same instrument, certainly improved , in opinion of Hegel: “the present is past improved”, thereupon the armies, for example, are improved long time, but men has kept same habit of domain or will of potency in opinion of Schopenhauer; thereby the history is same every moment, but same dynamic we can find in daily with person that we know, the same gestures, same word and same behavior; it is obvious, thereupon? In history is same, because the history is human result; we can consider a moment of France history(Jacque Bainville, Histoire de France, 1volume, pp.21-22), he said: “To occasion of his death, in 767, Pipin has pacified and reunited the Gaul whole and also the indocile Aquitaine…”, this mention is necessary to the successor, no direct but indirect of Pipin(714-768), this is Charles Magnus(748-814), the Bainville comments: “Thereupon Charles Magnus has had the benefit of unit. He has had so that of duration and he could exercise the power to fourth five years”; what is connection to other historical moments? Simple to other Charles, but now no Magnus but fifth, this is Charles 5^th(1500-1558), imperator of Germany, and Spain, and territories in USA and Holland, very famous is one his phase: “On my reign doesn’t set never the sun”, because over Europe also USA was partial Spanish, and he was also king of Spain; but this introduction is necessary to consider that Charles 5^th has had great fortune, because the Europe was generally pacified and he could exercise his potency on his reigns; same context of other Charles, this is Magnus, that after the peace he could reign, but distance between the two Charles is 719 years, and seven centuries are much in history; but the context is similar, same condition, and one that is protagonist because the kingdoms generally were in peace, thereupon he could reign, except some European wars but he was very calm, this condition was occurred also seven centuries before to France; thereby the course and recourse of history is truth.  

Alessandro Lusana