Some notation

The problem of immigration in USA is very important and radical are differences between two parties, federalist and antifederalist, because so names of two parties, in origin, this is after the war to independence; I don’t think that s revolution because some document certifies that in 1782 the states were independent; this is a act of congress to a question about New Hampshire, that is very useless but some names is important, the first is Congress and the president , that are mentioned in this session: “That in answer to the remaining part of the letter, which represents that the state of New Hampshire was over-rated in the requisition made by Congress…” but the Congress is impossible if these states were colonies; therefore is historical a right declaration of independence, but I think that British kingdom had just renounced to these lands. I understand that somebody is going to be irritated, but he must consider that we must divide between history that has occurred truly and propaganda that other question and necessary to other framework;  we must study the history and no certainly the lies of propaganda, that every nation uses because it must justify new regime or consolidate the present; today in politic is same, Churchill said that during a war the first victim is the truth; and today to every politic has adopted lie and truth in conformity to interest of nation; it is normal, above all after bloody events. Other notation is a step of constitution of USA that shows the persistent immigration to USA, we can read this step: “No person shall be a representative who shall not have attained to the age of twenty-five years, and been seven years a citizen of the United. States…”, a question, why alone seven years American citizen? Evidently because immigration was very important and limit that constitution has given; important I think consider that an act of 1790 of Congress said: “That any alien, being free white person, that shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of United States for the term , may be admitted to become a citizen thereof two years…”, why this limit is decreased? From seven years to two alone, with limits and other rules, but why this diminution? May because much immigrant were outcome from USA, or because a nascent nation has had need of citizens? I think that it is motive, because USA needed of worker, and limits were very serious, therefore beyond the native, in Latin jus soli, this is who born in a nation is citizen of this nation; in USA it is reality, but evidently in 1790 chosen was difficult, because immigration was very scarse.

Alessandro Lusana