Sceptical socratism

The read of Pirrone or his Pirronian sketches  are very interest to some judgement, because from this read emerges the relativism, or better still the socratic relativism; Socrates has always said, I can aid you to find your thruth, but it is possibleif your will is ready, and this is basing to nature of pupil, therefore Socrates has teach, although he has denied it, to find their thruth besing on nature and will of his students, this is moral relativism and he try to condition and preference of student; sceptical explication is very clear and easy, because Pyrron explains that deffirent conditions are present, he said: “Very much men has lovers very ugly, but they think that are very beauty…basing we are hungry or nothe food is very good and very disgasting to sated; this is relativism, but it is present in Socrates, although he hasn’t written it because he hasn’t written a book, but we must consider testified and his teaching that has always try search thruth through wit and intelligence of students, this is relativism, no certainly explicit or said, but very clear by examples. Other motive to this assay is that other socratic consideration; because during read Pyrronian sketches it is possible note that very much controversial examples we can read, examples very daily and therefore we can see it easily, a sound heard in a particular condition, or other object that we seen in particular conditions, therefore it is different or so appear, but it isn’t; this ascertainment leads us to understand that the knowledge is relative, and every one has a knowledge, Socrates has said that he knew that he doesn’t know, but it is regard him, and after questions that he has given other, he noted that other knew nothing, or has had very irrational knowledge, therefore, amid who has knowledge and who hasn’t it we can think that it is relative to every one; and skeptical think says it and it shows through cases that skeptical philosophy says that it is impossible has knowledge. These words are ulterior explaination: "Therefore everything is relative. Some things are similar, others dissimilar. But it is relativity. Threfore everythings is relative", as I have said above, but now is Pyrron that has said it, and other step is important, because Pyrron explained relativity: "So through obiection that this relativity is believed alone by us sceptical they show it, because every thing is relative". The sceptical phylosopher were some and no certainly all, therefore this opinion was relative.
Alessandro Lusana