Criterion of disorder

It is going to seem very strange, because in disorder usually isn’t a criterion, on contrary it there not is otherwise it could not disorder; but if we think  a cute of actor that he must say mistaking, he has prepared this cue and he has repeated until he has kept it in mind, therefore he have to say the order because words have their order during cue, and although untidy this disorder has a criterion, because it follows rule that actor has used to others cues, as right than mistake, because he must follows his criterion, this is keep in mind after very much repeated it, but there is a criterion, because the exercise is same and it is criterion or way that is very known by actor. We go in a room and we are impressed by order, everything is right and everything is clean, and we, although we don’t comment it, because it is very rudeness, but we are gratified by this order and cleanness; on contrary same room is untidy and filthy, we are very impressed from disorder and from filth, our wit is very stroke from this condition and we don’t comment but we are very impressed, but we don’t think never that to this disorder is an criterion that has though from somebody, because in disorder we, with irrational behavior, we set everything on known place; finally and it is very disorder but to others, on contrary to us is perfect; and we can think that it is skepticism; question is, now, one:  “what so philosophy to disorder”, Aristoteles, certainly, is not going to order to this room, it’s right, but daily philosophy is particular exercise to think and know philosophy, question is, how? Simple because this problem, not order and right set to everything, but skepticism is promoter of relativism; therefore what is to you disorder to me it is perfect order, because I can find everything on its place, because I have given this order, that is mine alone, to me, therefore it is order, but to you certainly o, because you could set everything in other set, thereupon you have your order, it is your  alone; thereby you have given your criterion to your disorder or order, that to me it is can disorder or order, this is skepticism, relating to you it is order but to me it isn’t; this is predominance of our personality, in limitated space, expressed through organizzation of our space, it as say: "This is my space and here I am can show my personality"; and it is as semiotic, because we give signals and precise indications about our personality, but our personality, it is mine and not your, thereby we turn to skepticism, to relation my personality it is order or desorder, and I can give signals and suggestions about my wit.  

Alessandro Lusana